diff --git a/.claude/skills/squad-issue/SKILL.md b/.claude/skills/squad-issue/SKILL.md
index 61e79f2..002b634 100644
--- a/.claude/skills/squad-issue/SKILL.md
+++ b/.claude/skills/squad-issue/SKILL.md
@@ -188,7 +188,9 @@ every Git and GitHub action yourself, including follow-up issues the Lead decide
     notifications or mark them `--unreported`, and run it again; exit code 4 names commits after the PR that
     no step-11 review row follows — run their delta review (step 11), or log a verbatim fix as such, and run it
     again. Append the tables exactly as printed (a run
-    without them is not wrapped up) to the comment under "Squad run metrics", and report the branch, the PR
+    without them is not wrapped up) to the comment under "Squad run metrics". Ask the user for the output of
+    `/usage` for this session (you cannot run it) and add it below the tables under "Session usage (`/usage`)"
+    verbatim, or "not provided" (`.squad/routing.md`, step 12). Report the branch, the PR
     URL, the tier, the `squad` issues (or "no lessons"), the metrics tables and any escalation or Lead
     decision to the user.
 
diff --git a/.squad/routing.md b/.squad/routing.md
index e5d0481..1df1f85 100644
--- a/.squad/routing.md
+++ b/.squad/routing.md
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ head; step 10 then only posts the working record, removes `specs/` and marks not
 | 9 | PR approval | Orchestrator, Lead when needed | *PR approval* below; with an *Early draft PR* also green CI, the dry-run result and the Reviewer's round on the same head |
 | 10 | Pull request | Orchestrator | Working record posted as comment (a long `plan.md` may be given as a permalink to the last commit that contains it plus a summary), `specs/<folder>/` removed and `scope-check.py --no-specs` clean, PR opened **as a draft** (*Draft until green*; merged later with *Squash and merge*) — or, after an *Early draft PR*, only the record and the removal |
 | 11 | After the PR | Dev, Code Officer, Reviewer | *Draft until green* holds and the PR is marked ready for review; review comments worked |
-| 12 | Wrap-up | Orchestrator | Squad lessons filed as one issue per destination (*Squad lessons*), or "no lessons" logged; the run metrics of `squad-log.py --summary` (exit 0) appended to the working record exactly as printed and reported to the user |
+| 12 | Wrap-up | Orchestrator | Squad lessons filed as one issue per destination (*Squad lessons*), or "no lessons" logged; the run metrics of `squad-log.py --summary` (exit 0) appended to the working record exactly as printed and reported to the user, followed by the session's `/usage` output (below the tables, headed "Session usage (`/usage`)"; a built-in command only the user can run, so the orchestrator asks for it at the end of the run, and with no answer writes "not provided") |
 
 ### PR approval
 
diff --git a/.squad/template.json b/.squad/template.json
index b6cb8e7..27602a3 100644
--- a/.squad/template.json
+++ b/.squad/template.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "repository": "LarsLaskowski/Squad-Spec-Repository-Template",
-  "commit": "94a7016687caeb831a5541bf83af6acc5fe07758",
+  "commit": "10c8e78aa57a4afaa0fec7ca6284617e8ec8b3a9",
   "profile": "dotnet",
   "profiles": [
     "dotnet"