From 163dc68d24f35ec5986f77d4606f9ab4ea1476fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Edouard=20Choini=C3=A8re?=
 <27212526+echoix@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 16:45:12 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 239: Incorrect
 return-value check for a 'scanf'-like function

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 raster/r.to.rast3elev/main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/raster/r.to.rast3elev/main.c b/raster/r.to.rast3elev/main.c
index 10f4f008c7d..bb6ecd8ecfe 100644
--- a/raster/r.to.rast3elev/main.c
+++ b/raster/r.to.rast3elev/main.c
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
     /*Set the upper value */
     if (param.upper->answer) {
-        if (sscanf(param.upper->answer, "%lf", &db.upper))
+        if (sscanf(param.upper->answer, "%lf", &db.upper) == 1)
             db.useUpperVal = 2;
         else
             G_fatal_error(_("The upper value is not valid"));
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
     /*Set the lower value */
     if (param.lower->answer) {
-        if (sscanf(param.lower->answer, "%lf", &db.lower))
+        if (sscanf(param.lower->answer, "%lf", &db.lower) == 1)
             db.useLowerVal = 2;
         else
             G_fatal_error(_("The lower value is not valid"));