Why are some environmental conditions arbitrarily discretised? #738
Replies: 3 comments
|
Hey! Environmental conditions are often not measured very precisely, imagine a real world drive somewhere and the driver would need to document and classify the current rain intensity. Having a double field would just create the illusion of precision. If your modlling requires discrete values I recommend to make a proposal to add e.g additional continous values without breaking backwards compatibility and allowing for more precise values not allowing them to contradict.
There is also a modelling working group and I suppose they have formed some opinions around it alrady. @PhRosenberger may know something here? Best regards |
|
Yes, I have already collected several discussions/issues/PRs on that topic and I would be glad if you, @mansoor2016, would join our project to elaborate on that topic! Here is a starting point for that: #601 |
|
Looks like the suggestions in #601 would resolve this discussion, closing this now. Thanks @jdsika & @PhRosenberger |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The precipitation intensity is provided as a discrete enum. why? It is not consistent for all env. conditions.
If you develop regression models for environmental effects, likely you will need continuous inputs.
Providing a double value field + a confidence level field would be a more useable design.
All reactions