| title | RF Vocabulary |
|---|---|
| description | Complete RF Vocabulary 0.1.0 contract, including every embedded Concept and Context. |
RF Vocabulary is Rootform's embedded cross-Dialect vocabulary. Its owner is
rf; its version is 0.1.0.
It is not an installable Dialect, local extension, or Policy Pack. Authors do
not declare or download it. Compiler records exact vocabulary dependency when a
Dialect or Policy Pack references an rf.* symbol.
These boundaries are normative. For example, a logical database inside a
managed service is not rf.concept.managed-database, and a role is not
rf.concept.service-identity.
A network Context records declared attachment. It does not prove routing, reachability, firewall allowance, or runtime traffic. A runtime Context records declared execution placement. It does not prove that execution happened.
RF Vocabulary 0.1.0 defines:
- six Concepts;
- two Contexts;
- no Relations;
- no Rules.
Therefore rf.relation.* and rf.rule.* are invalid references.
rule "subnet" {
match {
type = "example_subnet"
}
as = rf.concept.subnet
context {
as = rf.context.network
to = rf.concept.virtual-network
via = source.network_id
on_null = "absent"
on_empty = "absent"
}
}
Use an RF symbol only when provider-specific meaning satisfies its complete contract. Frequency or a similar name is insufficient.
policy "subnet-has-network-context" {
target {
concept = rf.concept.subnet
}
assert = exists(
contexts(rf.context.network, rf.concept.virtual-network)
)
message = "Each subnet must declare its virtual network."
}
Policy references are always owner-qualified, so rf. prefix is required.
Linking verifies exact vocabulary version and semantic digest against the
Form.