Skip to content

docs: Guide document maintenance update - #249

Merged
loom-fleet-dispatch[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/guide-update-20261102-021849
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

loom-fleet-dispatch[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/guide-update-20261102-021849

Conversation

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Automated document maintenance by the Guide triage agent.


Automated by Guide role - document maintenance phase

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added the loom:review-requested PR ready for Judge to review. Applied by: Builder when opening PR. label Nov 2, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

loom-fleet-dispatch Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR #249's loom:reviewing claim is held by the judge of sweep step-judge-249-1793586657 on host host-d0749b00. This comment is a PR lease record (#9401): its liveness signal is its own forge-assigned updated_at, renewed while the judge works and released when it is done. Another judge that finds this lease live stands down before touching a worktree. See defaults/docs/lease-record.md § "PR-phase leases".

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added the loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). label Nov 2, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

✅ Approved (Docs-Only Fast Path)

The paginated files API shows the changed-file list is exactly WORK_PLAN.md, an exact allowlist match, so no code evaluation applies. CI is green on the reviewed head (forge wait-checks returned LOOM-CHECKS-GREEN), merge state is CLEAN, and the formal-review gate returned CLEAR.

I checked the content claim with gh pr view: #238 and #241 are CLOSED and unmerged, and #248 is OPEN with loom:blocked. The edit matches that state.

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch loom-fleet-dispatch Bot added loom:pr PR approved by Judge, ready for Champion auto-merge. Applied by: Judge. and removed loom:review-requested PR ready for Judge to review. Applied by: Builder when opening PR. loom:reviewing Judge is reviewing this PR. Applied by: Judge only. Stale after LOOM_STALE_REVIEWING_MINUTES (30m). labels Nov 2, 2026
@loom-fleet-dispatch

loom-fleet-dispatch Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR #249's (no label: the lease is the claim) claim is held by the champion of sweep step-champion_merge-249-1793586778 on host host-d0749b00. This comment is a PR lease record (#9401): its liveness signal is its own forge-assigned updated_at, renewed while the champion works and released when it is done. Another champion that finds this lease live stands down before touching a worktree. See defaults/docs/lease-record.md § "PR-phase leases".

@loom-fleet-dispatch

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Champion Auto-Merge

This PR meets all safety criteria for automatic merging:

  • Judge approved (loom:pr label, verdict fresh against head 69c7fe9)
  • Merge-risk judgment passed: docs-only change to WORK_PLAN.md (+1/-2); no code surface; fully revertable
  • Diff size: 3 lines (+1/-2), informational, not a gate
  • No critical files modified (paginated file list: WORK_PLAN.md only)
  • No merge conflicts (MERGEABLE)
  • Updated recently (0 hours ago)
  • All CI checks passing

Proceeding with merge... If this was merged in error, you can revert with:
git revert -m 1 <merge-sha>


Automated by Champion role

loom dashboard

@loom-fleet-dispatch
loom-fleet-dispatch Bot merged commit f5f44a6 into main Nov 2, 2026
7 checks passed
@loom-fleet-dispatch
loom-fleet-dispatch Bot deleted the docs/guide-update-20261102-021849 branch November 2, 2026 02:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

loom:pr PR approved by Judge, ready for Champion auto-merge. Applied by: Judge.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants