feat: add long-horizon context integrity - #96
Draft
douglas-grishen wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
@agentplat/inference-control/context-integrityentrypoint with strict content-free contracts, canonical digests and a deterministic longitudinal reducerSafety and compatibility
admitandrestrictitems reach protected providers or adaptersValidation
pnpm run buildpnpm run type-checkpnpm run test:unit— 839 tests, 0 failures (1 skipped, 6 todo)pnpm run audit:public— 2,436 files, no secrets or restricted terminologypnpm run verify:pack— 48 tarballs and 93 packed API surfaces verified through clean pnpm and npm consumersStack
This PR is intentionally based on
codex/capability-state-fusion-v1(#95) so its diff contains only Long-Horizon Context Integrity V1. Retarget tomainafter #95 lands.