docs: identifier durability — recorded cases and the machine-readable remedy - #1
docs: identifier durability — recorded cases and the machine-readable remedy#1damienriehl wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
… remedy Cites the position paper 'Identifier Durability: Machine-Readable Canonical IRIs'. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MoZuH8vKiwL2rsX3a1zSqc
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 59 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Adds an Identifier durability section to
docs/schema.mdplus a new open question, and fixes the README's scheme example to matchdocs/schema.mdand the data (the oldmartyrologium_romanum_cei_2004example exists nowhere in the registry — that recorded contradiction is itself one of the section's cases).No existing identifier is changed, deprecated, or renamed by this PR. All argument lives in the position paper — this PR only demonstrates this repository's recorded cases and the remedied form: CatholicOS/foundation-docs#58 (discussion: CatholicOS/foundation-docs#57).
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01MoZuH8vKiwL2rsX3a1zSqc