Skip to content

DX: request reviews from code owners - #597

Draft
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 19 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/lock-0b04a976c8
Draft

dependabot[bot] wants to merge 19 commits into
mainfrom
dependabot/lock-0b04a976c8

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Nov 5, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🖱️ Developer experience

  • Pull requests now request a review from @ComPWA/maintainers automatically through a new CODEOWNERS file.
  • Documentation can use GitHub-style alerts such as > [!TIP], which also render on GitHub, through the MyST alert extension (myst-parser>=5.1); existing admonitions use this syntax now.

🔨 Maintenance

  • Read the Docs installs the doc dependency group with its native uv support instead of a custom Pixi install script, and fails the build on Sphinx warnings.
  • Code and benchmarks are adapted to the upgraded ty type checker.

Squash commit messages

* DX: use GitHub-style alerts in the documentation
* MAINT: build Read the Docs with its native uv support

@dependabot dependabot Bot added the ⬆️ Lock This PR upgrades the lock files label Nov 5, 2026
@redeboer redeboer changed the title MAINT: bump the lock group with 8 updates MAINT: upgrade lock files Nov 5, 2026
@redeboer
redeboer self-requested a review November 5, 2026 13:12
@redeboer
redeboer marked this pull request as draft November 5, 2026 13:26
@redeboer
redeboer force-pushed the dependabot/lock-0b04a976c8 branch 3 times, most recently from 4deb168 to a9a30c2 Compare November 6, 2026 21:47
@redeboer
redeboer force-pushed the dependabot/lock-0b04a976c8 branch from a9a30c2 to a6068fd Compare November 7, 2026 09:17
@redeboer redeboer changed the title MAINT: upgrade lock files DX: request reviews from code owners Nov 9, 2026
@redeboer redeboer added 🔨 Maintenance Maintenance and upkeep improvements 🖱️ DX Improvements to the Developer Experience labels Nov 9, 2026

@redeboer redeboer left a comment •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'TensorWaves benchmark results'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 2.

Benchmark suite Current: 7f41333 Previous: 96c79ad Ratio
benchmarks/expression.py::test_fit[1000-ScipyMinimizer-numpy] 7.18815624244307 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0006080932125984401) 16.20089733282377 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0002919331648110754) 2.25
benchmarks/expression.py::test_fit[1000-ScipyMinimizer-numba] 7.183023042839531 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0003092659861982649) 15.719486023422135 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00020436080552564467) 2.19
benchmarks/expression.py::test_fit[1000-ScipyMinimizer-tf] 0.621839289762586 iter/sec (stddev: 0.006087625260976393) 1.4510339953328852 iter/sec (stddev: 0.002136985793101471) 2.33
benchmarks/unbinned_nll.py::test_unbinned_nll_normalization_formula[original-numpy] 28.682961007777358 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00025618038814411733) 83.16394792483862 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00007097826620654797) 2.90
benchmarks/unbinned_nll.py::test_unbinned_nll_normalization_formula[original-tensorflow] 60.48374111943979 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0003688338925402337) 127.70369911146068 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00019483109407062498) 2.11
benchmarks/unbinned_nll.py::test_unbinned_nll_normalization_formula[optimized-numpy] 37.38113562909669 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00017562547471914526) 128.90182339052615 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00007047725297610706) 3.45
benchmarks/unbinned_nll.py::test_unbinned_nll_normalization_formula[optimized-tensorflow] 61.8025133114164 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0015130983055766517) 157.36058719247046 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0002361793019890102) 2.55
benchmarks/unbinned_nll.py::test_unbinned_nll_estimator[numpy] 126.78273638067525 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00017405114139234856) 342.6441228883796 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0001794193509548101) 2.70
benchmarks/unbinned_nll.py::test_unbinned_nll_estimator[numba] 100.29231085487463 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00008182487637235371) 535.093309487275 iter/sec (stddev: 0.00012515060065815384) 5.34

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

🖱️ DX Improvements to the Developer Experience ⬆️ Lock This PR upgrades the lock files 🔨 Maintenance Maintenance and upkeep improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants