Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
156 changes: 156 additions & 0 deletions research/qq16-provider-binding/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
# First selected gauge44 provider versus corrected QQ16 F0

The literal first selected provider is not corrected QQ16 F0. At the
constant-character, common-cover specialization its data map is
`G(x,y)=(x,y+x)`. The corrected QQ16 map Q has trace 120, whereas G has
trace 224. Including all 480 arbitrary persistent helpers gives traces
600 and 704. Thus **no fixed invertible role change conjugates these two
maps**, even if that role change mixes the data and all borrowed helpers.
The first direct output mismatch is already X_0, before any B1 decoder cut.

This is a scoped negative result and exact local invoice, not a new supplier,
an unrestricted impossibility theorem, or a selected-frontier change.

## Actual source and boundary

The base is `20ecf2891d80b5acf18d980b2164fb44ea7faa90`. The verifier binds
`calls[0]` in the pinned selected archive's
`t16/global/hosted/GLOBAL-TEMPLATE.json.gz`: time 0, replica 0, stage 0,
provider gauge44, orientation forward. Its forward program hash is
`071ecdacc0bb3ac16046aad4119ed551a945cb0ed6c57002a548a3e2232503d8`.
The embedded provider program equals the separate selected gauge44 program.
This selects actual source coefficients, not a similarly named abstract shear.

There are 704 distinct physical owner IDs: L_0,...,L_111 are X, L_112,...,
L_223 are Y, and L_224,...,L_703 are borrowed helpers. The first 224 IDs are
0,...,223 and their owner descriptors are `[1,0,p mod 112]`. Each remaining
helper retains its literal owner descriptor. The eight C registers are
separate owned private values. The source `CANONICAL-WORD.json.gz` supplies
all 704 input and output frame IDs; the receipt pins both full frame arrays
and the full owner list by canonical JSON SHA256. Frame IDs are not treated
as equal merely because their contents agree at the specialization.

The inherited [bridge convention](../joint-query/evidence/BRIDGE-REVIEW.md)
fixes the constant Fourier character: each native line is
`C_a=((1+i)I+(1-i)T_a)/2`, hence C_a(1)=1; translations and signed products
also fix it. Cover permutations fix arrays constant over covers. The
common-chart scalar specialization therefore supplies a necessary test for
role-only correspondences that preserve this subspace. The verifier executes
all scalar instructions in their actual order and specializes the declared
native events to identity. This does not reverify native child kernels or
the global hosting theorem.

All 712 independent formal inputs are retained during replay. Both outputs
have identity rows on all 480 helpers and zero rows on all eight private
values. Data outputs are independent of initial helper and private values.
Native helper frames can change; identity here means their specialized
logical content. The full 712-dimensional maps discard private inputs and
are not asserted invertible.

## Exact first mismatch and mapping class

Let A and T be the eight selected sets in the QQ16 packet, U their
96-port complement, R its actual 8-by-112 centre matrix, and K=R^T/4.
The independent formula check gives

```
f = R x
X'_U = x_U - K_U f
X'_A = K_A R_T x_T
X'_T = K_T f
Y'_U = y_U + X'_U
Y'_S = y_S + x_S - X'_S (S = A union T)
```

In particular, selected gauge44 returns `X'_0=x_0`, whereas QQ16 returns
`X'_0=(x_76-x_81+x_87+x_92)/2`. Input x_0=1 with every other data and helper
symbol zero is already decisive.

The excluded class consists of a **single fixed invertible matrix P on the
704 persistent specialized roles**, used at both entrance and exit. It
would require `P^-1 G P=Q`; trace invariance contradicts 704 != 600.
This includes permutations, signed/diagonal role gauges, and arbitrary
invertible constant mixing of those roles. A physical correspondence whose
restriction is such an invertible P also fails this necessary test.
Different entrance and exit encodings, a noninvertible relation, a change
of native representation that does not preserve the tested subspace, and
paid adapters are outside this class. No claim of a complete program
bisimulation or all-purpose representation obstruction is made.

## Paid repair obligation and local invoice

The exact rank of Q-G on the 224 data roles is 24. A proof of its kernel is
short: equality requires x_S=0 from the selected Y equations, then
R_U x_U=0 from the U equations. Since R_U K_U=12I, that kernel has dimension
96-8=88 in x and all 112 dimensions in y. Thus its dimension is 200.
The verifier also establishes rank 24 directly by rational elimination and
checks that Q is invertible. Any post-adapter E with E Q=G must consequently
have `rank(E-I)=24`. A product of rank-one elementary updates requires at
least 24 such factors, by rank subadditivity. This is an algebraic lower
bound, not a full physical invoice or an adapter implementation.

| Exact local item | Selected gauge44 | Corrected QQ16 F0 |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| Real scalar primitive allowance | 198766 | 211210 |
| Extra scalar allowance before any repair | 0 | 12444 |
| Source centre children | eight H8 | zero |
| Added selected native lines | zero | eight H1 |
| Borrowed helper outputs | 480 returned | 480 returned |
| Owned private outputs | eight zero | eight zero |

Persistent climb/adapter/residual-adapter event lists are compared exactly
and are unchanged. The scalar allowances count the full literal words,
including private clearing and dirty-helper correction. The native difference
`-8 H8 + 8 H1` is conditional on a valid replacement: the missing boundary
repair cannot be omitted from a construction budget. No native saving,
physical repair cost, or global advantage is certified here.

The requested matched boundary through B1 therefore stops at F0. Carrying
an unmatched source state into a B1 decoder would assume the correspondence
this check disproves. A new round needs either paid distinct boundary maps
or an explicitly broader correspondence and its physical price.

## Reproduction and validation

```
python3 -I -O -Werror -B research/qq16-provider-binding/verify.py --controls
python3 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/qq16-provider-binding
```

Every live input is hashed before parsing; no predecessor Python module is
imported. Exact source and output hashes are in SOURCES.json and RESULT.json.
The normal replay is read-only; `--write` creates only this
package's receipt when absent and refuses to overwrite an existing receipt. The controls independently mutate a selected-source
coefficient and a QQ16 wrapper coefficient and require both to fail.
The registered test also verifies a Git-free source export and rejects a
changed source hash and a changed receipt, including a Boolean/integer type
substitution. No complete selected cold replay or formal theorem proof is
claimed or needed for this isolated obstruction package.

## Attribution and overlap

The selected physical archive, original corrected joint-query construction,
and its scalar/native/bridge reviews are retained unchanged and credited to
their original contributors. This extends the selected-caller missing-binding
audit (#3976) by evaluating the actual first provider and supplying a precise
mapping-class obstruction. It does not repeat the query decoder optimization
in #4003 or the zero-extra-owned-register decoder of #4015
(`0fff81d8997cef646538bcd4f60d7d455cf93b8e`). The fixed-104-owner,
one-common-query-frame formal-moment obstruction in tekuuu's #4030
(`12df564caa8918453de658fe49601de6a9227017`) concerns a different consumer
class; no result from that pending package is assumed here.

Chris R / Clear1nsight with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance supplied this package.
New code and prose are Apache-2.0. No independent human review is claimed.

## Open next questions

1. Can distinct, paid entrance and exit maps bind QQ16 F0 to this exact
selected call? Start by constructing E=GQ^-1 in the specialized algebra,
then bind its native frames, owner routes, scratch returns and full cost.
The rank-24 obligation and +12444 scalar delta prevent treating it as free;
no affordable physical lift is yet available.
2. Can an end-to-end source substitution change the first provider and its
caller contract instead? Start from this literal F0 mismatch and name the
exact downstream selected work replaced. A first B1 consumer match and
complete family budget are prerequisites for another decoder round.
69 changes: 69 additions & 0 deletions research/qq16-provider-binding/RESULT.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
{
"QQ16_added_native_lines": 8,
"QQ16_scalar_real_primitives": 211210,
"arbitrary_helpers_returned": 480,
"archive_member_sha256": {
"t16/global/base/providers/gauge44/CANONICAL-WORD.json.gz": "16bc0ebb04b4be6c0ade74badc6a0c0cdba4215eda86e4ff9f13abf8ecebd219",
"t16/global/base/providers/gauge44/LOCAL-PROGRAMS.json.gz": "241fde27d4e43f5a9cb6b128f9f76c5131a53d09f0371676163f914d0b0fef3a",
"t16/global/hosted/GLOBAL-TEMPLATE.json.gz": "73f47a1e60b1e4ea66dbca9a497c411c8e6adc7984e276a437a10a9a7a13b47a"
},
"data_difference_rank": 24,
"data_traces": [
224,
120
],
"first_mismatch": {
"QQ16": "(X_76-X_81+X_87+X_92)/2",
"output": "X_0",
"selected": "X_0"
},
"independent_input_symbols": 712,
"minimum_rank_one_factors_for_post_adapter": 24,
"persistent_traces": [
704,
600
],
"post_adapter_rank_minus_identity": 24,
"private_outputs_zero": 8,
"scalar_delta": 12444,
"schema_version": 1,
"scope": "Exact first source call and constant-character common-cover specialization; fixed invertible role conjugacy only. No physical adapter, B1 match, or supplier is constructed.",
"source_call": {
"local_program_sha256": "071ecdacc0bb3ac16046aad4119ed551a945cb0ed6c57002a548a3e2232503d8",
"orientation": "forward",
"pair": 0,
"provider_id": "gauge44",
"replica": 0,
"stage": 0,
"time": 0,
"window": {
"local_axes": [
0,
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8
],
"prefix_axes": []
}
},
"source_center_ranks": [
8,
8,
8,
8,
8,
8,
8,
8
],
"source_final_frames_sha256": "feef65df95af9ae193a9988edb5a7e9d3c607c8e4b7ffab3f3ef610dc184f1be",
"source_owner_list_sha256": "b0a39b7a3e5f5f4b7ab8c38d87de9ab66ec1499b3c0f3e50090d08c3dcfe62b3",
"source_scalar_real_primitives": 198766,
"source_start_frames_sha256": "bf49fb9bd01d22ae305cd0909e13409c6ffe0290fc1c2a35928e2c6162758f54",
"status": "scoped obstruction; no frontier change"
}
48 changes: 48 additions & 0 deletions research/qq16-provider-binding/SOURCES.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
{
"schema_version": 1,
"base_commit": "20ecf2891d80b5acf18d980b2164fb44ea7faa90",
"files": [
{
"path": "certificates/selected-result.json",
"usage": "provenance",
"git_blob": "b1fea0c94436b236cc2b7d41a7be032811b94c81",
"sha256": "bb2eaa58647b353f88d0aec2eafb9d30df1be53589231b23e12ceef3e4bad129"
},
{
"path": "docs/research/agent-task-catalog.json",
"usage": "provenance",
"git_blob": "67f085acd86acd7d4e03922d9cf4b26bca66fed5",
"sha256": "47b42433f5a85809a3aadd29c2c339da2c6ed728e4f7762df6b88bccb7874cf0"
},
{
"path": "research/community-frontier1042-audit/selected-replay.tar.gz",
"usage": "input",
"git_blob": "6f4dc6fe7631d8aacf8081fcaecf32197181685b",
"sha256": "22c3f4dce4b897a1d423d1388801933e288b6a6b1906cb15e1b16a5eb68db754"
},
{
"path": "research/joint-query/certificate.json.gz",
"usage": "input",
"git_blob": "c6e876d8b48d768214deee265ade428f8983b566",
"sha256": "a5ed85fac5ebf3c091482a113ab0d351eb5a7892fe2841a35e16017ec1ff49f7"
},
{
"path": "research/joint-query/evidence/BRIDGE-REVIEW.md",
"usage": "input",
"git_blob": "86139908c418235588045324f0873de6ac9f9707",
"sha256": "d01b5f4959f7c91f835496d050dfae3eeab9dee2f581571c316a42571eaa1cd3"
},
{
"path": "research/joint-query/evidence/JOINT-QUERY-TRANSFER.md",
"usage": "input",
"git_blob": "a6805c58f23132f9420efebf90f5b7e863c2e179",
"sha256": "9e13e73ebf3192a6548798c2f1d13bd4d83957e8db0dc34de12b1a5311a52a75"
},
{
"path": "research/joint-query/evidence/SCALAR-REVIEW.md",
"usage": "input",
"git_blob": "e060789dfa3deafc49002b9f127de89800578bd1",
"sha256": "aa7b9f74430b56c42e1099029a501a9b6be9ab56b81bfdc681e4c2e6ff5bc97d"
}
]
}
85 changes: 85 additions & 0 deletions research/qq16-provider-binding/TASK.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
{
"schema_version": 1,
"task_id": "joint-query-controller",
"priority_revision": 6,
"base_commit": "20ecf2891d80b5acf18d980b2164fb44ea7faa90",
"original_card": {
"id": "joint-query-controller",
"question": "Can a literal QQ16 producer meet the proposed completed-output error budgets with dirty helpers and an affordable physical consumer?",
"starting_points": [
"docs/research/research-family-status.md",
"research/joint-query/README.md",
"research/joint-query/evidence/QQ16-SELECTED-WITNESS.md",
"research/joint-query/evidence/JOINT-QUERY-TRANSFER.md",
"docs/research/community-efficient1000-review.md",
"research/qq16-producer-defect-transfer/README.md"
],
"methods": [
"Derive one literal producer's completed-output defects and intermediate dirty-helper bounds, with its physical bill.",
"Design or audit one consumer, retention or hosting boundary and its complete cost for the pinned producer/decoder."
],
"acceptance_gate": "Name the changed premise of the fixed F0/B1 observation obstruction. Show exactly which query is recovered, legal native reads and restoration, and a full favorable budget including cover maps, helpers and endpoints. Local inverse identities alone do not close the global controller. A scoped local result may be retained without a complete supplier. Expanding it into further construction rounds requires the family-level budget and obligation gate in research-family-status.md; an optimistic passing relaxation alone is not acceptance.",
"first_step": {
"command": [
"python3",
"-B",
"scripts/research_baseline.py"
],
"expected": "PASS_RESEARCH_BASELINE_BINDINGS_ONLY",
"inspect": "Read the revision-6 family record and #2965 producer-defect transfer after the local QQ16 decoder contract. Its author-checked output-error estimate does not implement producer interiors, bound dirty helpers, or pay for the consumer; independently check the implication used.",
"scope": "Source-bound orientation only. Read the named package and review before relying on its local evidence; this command is not its replay or supplier admission."
},
"first_experiment": "Pin one literal F0/B1 producer and its native-child contracts; derive the actual intermediate magnitude ledger and completed-output defects, including dirty helpers and correlations. Compare with #2965 budgets and price storage, movement, cleanup and F17 consumption. Stop with a precise missing bound if no producer contract supplies it; do not optimize another decoder precision constant in isolation.",
"bottleneck_link": "The native local words exist; retained query information and its physical access are the missing link to a composed recursive interface.",
"allowed_variations": [
"One paid query, one changed first pair, or one precisely specified affine helper state.",
"A counterexample or lower bound for that exact proposed repair.",
"One unresolved obligation of a newer local decoder, with exact source heads and a distinct claim/domain."
],
"scope_change_triggers": [
"Retaining the fixed first pair and ordinary schedule while allowing only homogeneous selected-only control, already excluded by the witness.",
"Treating cover-map counts as zero-cost physical address operations.",
"Recreating the pending complete local decoder or early-record/output-bank coalescing already under investigation without a distinct audit or changed premise.",
"Treating a completed-output defect inequality as a producer-interior, dirty-range or physical-cost certificate."
],
"overlap_terms": [
"QQ16",
"joint-query",
"changing-chart controller",
"selected observation",
"1969",
"2540",
"early record",
"output-bank retention",
"complete native decoder",
"2965",
"producer defect",
"dirty-helper range",
"F17 consumer"
]
},
"scope_status": "refined",
"actual_scope": "Bind the literal first selected gauge44 forward provider to corrected QQ16 F0 and test fixed invertible persistent-role conjugacy.",
"scope_change_reason": "The actual source-provider match is required before importing a B1 decoder cut; this tests that prerequisite directly.",
"bottleneck_link": "A decoder budget cannot replace source work until the actual F0 boundary and its repair price are bound.",
"budget_minutes": 60,
"stop_rule": "Stop at the first exact mismatch or scoped correspondence obstruction; do not optimize an unbound decoder.",
"outcome": "negative-result",
"evidence": "RESULT.json; verify.py; exact 712-symbol replay and rank/trace proof in README.md",
"author": "Chris R / Clear1nsight with OpenAI Codex assistance",
"ai_assistance": "Substantial OpenAI Codex assistance for analysis, code, and prose; no independent human review claimed.",
"open_questions": [
{
"question": "Can distinct paid boundary maps bind this literal source provider?",
"why_it_matters": "A valid source substitution needs matching boundaries.",
"first_step": "Construct GQ^-1 at the specialization and price a native lift.",
"blocked_by": "No native frame/owner/cleanup implementation or favorable full invoice."
},
{
"question": "Can an end-to-end caller change replace selected first-provider work?",
"why_it_matters": "A different caller may permit a broader correspondence.",
"first_step": "Name the exact downstream work replaced and bind the first B1 input.",
"blocked_by": "No matched B1 boundary or family-level budget."
}
]
}
Loading