Repository navigation
Prove one-query endpoint and paid-scan bounds for the triangular carrier - #4057
RossRichardson wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
RossRichardson
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed exact head bf793d8739ad26f2aaba023de6bebca50fc67356 against canonical main 20ecf2891d80b5acf18d980b2164fb44ea7faa90.
No actionable mathematical defect found in the assigned endpoint-proof scope. Separate AI review checked the finite-dictionary tensor-ray argument, sequential untouched-column vanishing, support uncertainty K_G K_F >= 4^f and the resulting >=2f scalar-ADD bound. The arbitrary-dirty-helper argument retains its carrier-row vanishing premise and queried width <=M. The actual native phase/tensor bindings and full-column Gaussian checker agree with the needed hypotheses. Growing paid controllers remain permitted.
The archived 24^5 / 26^5 / 26^5 five-query searches were not independently reexecuted or validated here; they remain archival evidence, not a general five-query impossibility. No complete-caller stock floor, physical supplier, formal-kernel result or new kappa is established.
Fresh committed-byte/source-history and registered metadata/pin checks pass. Existing CI run 39248202294 was read back completed/success at this exact head. The review used written-proof/source inspection, not a fresh package-suite run.
Size: 17,146 added lines across 41 files; 14,157 JSON lines and 2,105 Python lines, 400,558 bytes total. The description should use the required four-section format, remove the invalid -standalone commit suffix, and link the canonical finding. Prepared by Ross Richardson with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance; no independent human acceptance is claimed.
Summary
research/one-query-endpoint-scan/, including the actual 19 native 64×64 Gaussian base matrices and a restored-helper argument with its queried-width boundary.Scope and limits
The helper extension retains its carrier-row vanishing premise and queried width ≤M. Changed cuts, multi-bank queries, wider queried helpers, nonmonomial endpoints and cross-cut sharing remain outside the theorem. Written all-parameter proofs are distinguished from finite base checks.
The repeated, varied-primal and primal/dual-route five-query searches are an archival appendix. The registered command hashes their receipts but does not rerun those searches; they do not establish a general five-query impossibility. No complete-caller stock floor, new κ, selected-frontier change, physical supplier admission or formal-kernel theorem is claimed.
See the proof, coverage and limits, and task, scope change and open next questions.
Test plan
bf793d8739ad26f2aaba023de6bebca50fc67356:python3.12 -B scripts/check_research_commit.py --package research/one-query-endpoint-scan --check-source-historyandpython3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/one-query-endpoint-scan --check-onlypass. These establish committed bytes, history, metadata and pins.python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/one-query-endpoint-scan. This review reused that run; it did not rerun the package suite.The earlier author-reported local and Git-free export checks are recorded in the canonical finding. AI review is not independent human or formal-kernel acceptance.
Sources and credit
Canonical base
20ecf2891d80b5acf18d980b2164fb44ea7faa90, priority revision 6. SOURCES, BINDINGS and RELATED-WORK retain exact ancestry and explain the changed task scope and nearest overlaps. Live Discussion/open-PR overlap coverage is partial, not a novelty certificate. Canonical publication.Ross Richardson with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance; Apache-2.0. Preserve icekylinx/PR531 and Rohan Arun/kernel92 compiler notices and recorded ancestry; Chris R/Clear1nsight #3987 and ToikY #4002 signed-lift/phase credit; and Clear1nsight's distinct #3989/#4045 interface/volume work. Earlier #3630/#3632/#3645/#3649/#3655 and separate BIT #4021/#4023 are excluded from these new claims. No merge requested.