Skip to content

research: refined-induction ceiling on #4436's direct flow grows with lockstep depth (log-gap g, no new κ) - #4465

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
pinterbanget:direct-flow-loggap
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
pinterbanget:direct-flow-loggap

Conversation

@pinterbanget

@pinterbanget pinterbanget commented Oct 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

This adds research/direct-flow-log-gap/. It follows my #4459 correction, where leaf exits turned out to dominate, and asks what the total exit coefficient of zxv's #4436 direct flow can certify under #4405's refined induction (κ(N,z0) ≤ η = z0 m^{z0−1}).

Claim type: a first-order argument plus finite floating-point evidence. No new κ.

Results

  • Balance. At the unit root t* (Σ W_k k^t = Σ P_r r^t, s* = 0.0026865), exit and source potentials balance to 10⁻⁹.
  • First order. κ ≈ exp(−(z0−t*)g), where g = E_S[ln s] − E_X[ln e] is the t*-weighted log-gap. This matches the exact κ to 3·10⁻⁵. Since η ≈ exp(−(1−z0)(1+ln m)), the test certifies savings up to cap = s*·g/(g + 1 + ln m).
  • Measured. g is a sawtooth in N, but its per-level minima rise by about 0.23 per lockstep level: 1.98, 2.20, 2.54, 2.75, 2.95 (in the verifier), then 3.21, 3.37 (local run to N = 1.73·10⁷). The cap at those minima goes 0.00068 → 0.00099. Saving 0.0008 passes for N ≥ 3·10⁵, and 0.001 does not yet. This is consistent with Independently check #4436's direct overlapping flow: all 9 recorded flows reproduced, exact potential identity to rank 1000, L(1000) matches (no new κ) #4456's effective savings.
  • Driver (update). Only the leaf exits sink: their log-depth goes 5.02 → 6.21, while boundary exits (≈1.84) and sources (≈2.45) stay put. A leaf exit is a tilted P-walk below the barrier G ln 5, with relative drift +0.0165. That suggests a meander law, g ~ a + b√G.
  • Reading. The ceiling is not bounded away from s* if g → ∞, but convergence is extremely slow. Saving 0.0023 needs g ≈ 34.5: about N ~ 10^{100} under linear growth, or N ~ 10^{900} under √G. Both are heuristic. The direct flow is not a practical substitute for the tensor/padding route near the selected κ unless the induction itself improves.

Evidence

python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/direct-flow-log-gap --check-only
  PASS_PACKAGE_METADATA_AND_PINS (not a mathematical acceptance check)
python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/direct-flow-log-gap
  PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE research/direct-flow-log-gap outcome=completed   (~7 s, stdlib only)

The local large run is evidence/gap_large.py 2e7, output evidence/LOGGAP-LARGE.txt (sha256 855a9e8a… (committed LF bytes)). Head: 36d9c475d4bbc99e93952e0ad86a802e1bc581e8. Base: canonical main 2a13eb18.

Not covered

  • A proof that g → ∞.
  • Multi-step exit tests.
  • Native premises.

Credit: zxv (#4436), 1337isnot1337 (#4405) and Jacob Alan Sussman (Theorem 1G). Prepared by Ryanson Jonathan with substantial Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) assistance.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

pinterbanget and others added 2 commits October 22, 2026 06:09
…ows with lockstep depth (log-gap g, no new κ)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…on extrapolation

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants