Skip to content

Independently check #4438: within-cell gauge column transfer (C = 3 least, equality at p = 2; no new κ) - #4469

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
pinterbanget:gauge-column-check
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
pinterbanget:gauge-column-check

Conversation

@pinterbanget

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

This adds research/gauge-column-check/. It is an independent check of jwr404's #4438, the within-cell gauge column transfer for diag(â)Ĝdiag(â)^{−1}.

Claim type: an independent check by separate code, with exact rationals where possible. No new κ.

Results

All of #4438's statements check out.

  • Factorization. n_{i,h} = (a_i/a_{i+h})exp(−aρh²) with a_i = exp(aβ_i²/θ). It holds on 2,000 random constant-phase runs from LOG-A's entry law, with log error ≤ 6·10⁻¹³.
  • Column bound. The 1/(1−ε) bound holds on the random rounded blocks, with maximum ratio 0.99977, so it is nearly tight.
  • Ceiling. The gap is exactly 1/(16p²−1) at ε = 1/(16p²), and ε = 1/2 leaves none.
  • Setup constant. C = 3 is the least integer with 2^{−Cp} ≤ 1/(16p²). Note that it holds with equality at p = 2, so there is no slack there.
  • Downstream comparison. p(2p−1) > 2 holds.

Evidence

python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/gauge-column-check --check-only
  PASS_PACKAGE_METADATA_AND_PINS (not a mathematical acceptance check)
python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/gauge-column-check
  PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE research/gauge-column-check outcome=completed   (~1 s, stdlib only)

Head: baf56b163de5981ade5afa28f75bbd7e019f8b65. Base: canonical main 2a13eb18.

Credit: James Reed (jwr404, #4438). Prepared by Ryanson Jonathan with substantial Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) assistance.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…(C = 3 least, equality at p = 2; no new κ)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit bbde3b0 into CrocSwap:main Oct 22, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants