Skip to content

Independently recount #4450's THREE-base paid census (3,554 calls, rank mass 5,157, both orientations; no new κ) - #4475

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
pinterbanget:three-base-census-recount
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
pinterbanget:three-base-census-recount

Conversation

@pinterbanget

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

This adds research/three-base-census-recount/. It is an independent recount of mihir-s-05's #4450, the THREE-base supplier's paid-event census, by separately written GF(2) code.

Claim type: an independent recount. No new κ.

Results

Everything is identical in both orientations and matches #4450 exactly.

  • Frames and events. All 1,159 frame bases are independent. Every paid climb and center event moves between nested frames, and its recomputed dimension gap equals the declared rank.
  • Split profile. {1:2487, 2:713, 3:232, 4:102, 5:28}. The 16 center events coalesce in adjacent pairs to give the unsplit profile {1:2487, 2:713, 3:224, 4:102, 5:20, 8:8}: 3,554 calls, rank mass 5,157.
  • Per-phase table. A, B, cleanup tail and final all match.
  • Helper increments (fields 224..631): {5:28, 6:18, 7:56, 8:93, 9:213}, mass 3,301.

Evidence

python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/three-base-census-recount --check-only
  PASS_PACKAGE_METADATA_AND_PINS (not a mathematical acceptance check)
python3.12 -B scripts/research_package.py --package research/three-base-census-recount
  PASS_REGISTERED_RESEARCH_PACKAGE research/three-base-census-recount outcome=completed

Head: 7bc7f069615d57e34c0992a33b115976fe0ff346. Base: canonical main 2a13eb18.

Credit: mihir-s-05 (#4450). Prepared by Ryanson Jonathan with substantial Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5) assistance.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…alls, rank mass 5,157, both orientations; no new κ)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit bbde3b0 into CrocSwap:main Oct 22, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants