Repository navigation
Place a core row past the agreement radius p^26 (no new κ) - #4491
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2 of 3 tasks
This was referenced Oct 22, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Question
#4490 uses
||B - P|| < p^6 exp(-p^2)on one core axis. Does a core row kept at distanceA = ceil(p^{48})from every face lie past the within-cell agreement radius of #4452?Result
Let
p ≥ 2and0 ≤ W ≤ p - 1. The bandwidthR = (2 p^{24} - 1) WsatisfiesR < p^{26}, becauseFor an integer
p,A = p^{48}, andp^{48} = p^{26} p^{22}withp^{22} ≥ 2^{22} > 1. ThusR < p^{26} < A. The core row is strictly outside that bandwidth, so its section-polynomial row is the global polynomial row. Under the #4452 gauge,||P - H_sec^{-1}||_2 < p^6 exp(-p^2).Distance
p^{25}fails: atp = 2the loose radius is2^{25} + 1.Claim type: one distance comparison. No new κ. The ideal gaps stay hypotheses, and the operator bound is not re-proved. The #4100 notes still use
p^{10} exp(-p^2).The locality audit already says
Aclears the written radius forJ = ceil(p^{42}). This comparison is against the lowered radiusp^{26}.This branch starts from canonical main. It does not replay #4452.
Test plan
PASS_GAUSSIAN_CORE_ROWandoutcome=completedon this machine. Maintainer replay has not been run.Base
2a13eb1827784206202db90e5dc8327cf8a250db, priority revision 7, selection refresh κ =23/10000.Prepared by James Reed with substantial Cursor Grok 4.7 assistance.