Repository navigation
Independently audit PR4992 sharp five-label excess cap - #5049
Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 1 commit intoOct 23, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ali Romman's PR #4992 requested independent review of its sharp high-weight cap. This adds one isolated audit package: an AI-assisted review of the written proof and a separately implemented six-plus-six path join that checks the complete five-label, length-twelve cycle domain without using the audited theorem as a pruning rule. No blocking gap or counterexample was found in the stated scope.
Proof audit and completeness argument · exact receipt · canonical claim.
Result and added coverage
The independent enumeration finds 221,700 rooted cycles up to reversal, including 49,680 universal cycles. All 298,080 high-weight functional checks have excess at most 11, with equality at each mask; no universal weight-four (8,4) split occurs. The full histogram agrees with PR4907's prior measurements after the exact symmetry factor 60. Those measurements and the sharp theorem remain credited predecessor results.
The new method joins all pairs of six-edge simple paths with common endpoints and disjoint interiors. It imports no predecessor executable and uses no matching, quotient or excess pruning. Six small domains compare complete cycle sets against all 77,019 literal words. The proof review explicitly checks the repeated-projection argument, the allowed repeated minority projection y=w, and the affine-basis reduction for the support lemma.
This is independent implementation and AI-assisted review, not independent human or proof-kernel acceptance. It changes no maintained engine, supplier, paid profile or selected frontier; selected kappa remains 60403/20000000.
Verification
Windows 11 / CPython 3.12.0, standard library:
Export SHA-256:
390f02f42b334ad4c4eec372f1648a65a03d96e9a62850c7b14c8a7f0585d6dd. The optional full-history ancestry preflight was not run in this shallow clone. No selected cold replay, seven-label census, engine integration or complete multiplication theorem is claimed.Task, overlap and attribution
Handoff-first, priority revision 7, with a declared change from the generic census-pruning-audit card. Base f259dab; audited PR4992 head 12a0105. Its three reviewed blobs match both the retained main files and exact public author head.
Canonical main refreshed to 4c0a359 before publication: governing guidance, selected record and audited inputs are unchanged. Final advisory overlap snapshots covered 304 open PRs and 4,153 Discussion records with complete pagination; 103 local records were searched, with 6,609 tracked notes omitted. Arbitrary diffs and unpublished work remain limits. PR5001 and JoyboyBrian's active prefix-engine integration are explicitly separate.
Credit Ali Romman / #4992, Mihir Srivastava / #4907, Nick Petalas / #4894, and the retained unpaidmoon, Nicholas Stone, James Reed and Ross Richardson lineage. Original sources/notices remain unchanged. Prepared by Mihir Srivastava with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance, solo; the review was not blinded. New work is Apache-2.0.
Open next question: independent human or proof-assistant review of the four-block contradiction and affine support reduction. No larger census or duplicate engine-integration task is proposed.