Skip to content

Prove exact two-call cost for the tied width-two transform - #5222

Merged
Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JoyboyBrian:brian/r13-tied-width-two-transform-exact-call-cost
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

Mister-Meeseeks merged 2 commits into
CrocSwap:mainfrom
JoyboyBrian:brian/r13-tied-width-two-transform-exact-call-cost

Conversation

@JoyboyBrian

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The widened complex register-mixing game left the optimum paid-call count at fixed tied width two unresolved as the address dimension grows. This package proves that the dense transform costs exactly two paid calls for every m>=2 (one for m=1). The proof generates the complete free sector algebra from tied monomials, bounds every one-call program with arbitrary clean helpers, and constructs two simultaneous cross-sector factors with all helpers reset. Every nonzero allowed source direction is covered by tied perfect-matching conjugacy.

The exact PR #4628 engine contract is retained byte-identically with its original provenance; PR #5178 is the width-bound predecessor. The result concerns the widened game. Free mixing, projector expansion and cleanup are finite but not physically priced; the narrower affine engine and selected multiplication frontier are unchanged.

Validation: registered Python 3.12 normal and optimized checks; exact Gaussian-integer gauges in the first two dimensions; independent ordered-tensor/sparse-factor and four-root projector controls; source ancestry; official ten-file export; readonly Git-free cold checks; nine actual source/receipt/scientific mutations rejected in both modes. Independent AI-assisted written proof and source review passed. No numerical solver, Lean or historical suite was run.

Prepared by JoyboyBrian with substantial OpenAI Codex assistance; Apache-2.0 and predecessor attribution retained.

@Mister-Meeseeks
Mister-Meeseeks merged commit 5a0e4b6 into CrocSwap:main Oct 23, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants