fix(data-pipeline): pass obfuscation config to OTLP stats by mabdinur · Pull Request #2444 · DataDog/libdatadog

mabdinur · 2026-09-01T17:21:06Z

What does this PR do?

Passes the builder client-side stats obfuscation flag to the OTLP stats concentrator through the same shared configuration stored by the trace exporter.

Adds regression coverage proving SQL resources remain raw when the flag is disabled and are obfuscated before OTLP aggregation when it is enabled.

Motivation

APMAPI-2317 found that the OTLP stats path created its concentrator with an independent, disabled obfuscation configuration. This change ensures the first OTLP stats bucket receives the configured opt-in state.

Additional Notes

There are no public API or wire-format changes. The behavior remains gated by the existing stats-obfuscation feature.

How to test the change?

cargo +nightly-2026-07-26 fmt --all -- --check
cargo check -p libdd-data-pipeline --features stats-obfuscation
cargo +stable clippy -p libdd-data-pipeline --all-targets --features stats-obfuscation -- -D warnings
cargo nextest run -p libdd-data-pipeline --features stats-obfuscation (200 tests passed)

Initialize the shared stats obfuscation configuration from the builder flag before the OTLP concentrator starts, and cover enabled and disabled SQL aggregation behavior. Refs APMAPI-2317.

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-09-01T17:21:19Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-01T17:23:20.157972Z	`1e57bb1`	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

datadog-prod-us1-4 · 2026-09-01T17:33:41Z

✅ All CI checks and tests passed.

🎉 All green!

🧪 All tests passed
❄️ No new flaky tests detected

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 97.83%
• Overall Coverage: 76.94% (+0.05%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 1e57bb1 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback!}

pr-commenter · 2026-09-01T17:37:59Z

Benchmarks

Comparison

Benchmark execution time: 2026-09-01 17:35:02

Comparing candidate commit 1e57bb1 in PR branch codex/apmapi-2317-otlp-stats-obfuscation with baseline commit 3c5ccac in branch main.

Found 2 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 22 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay

🟩 execution_time [-202.045µs; -168.700µs] or [-8.364%; -6.984%]
🟩 throughput [+114663.752op/s; +138382.452op/s] or [+7.689%; +9.280%]

Candidate

Candidate benchmark details

Group 1

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`1e57bb1`	1788283238	codex/apmapi-2317-otlp-stats-obfuscation

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	56.297ms	56.627ms ± 0.186ms	56.587ms ± 0.110ms	56.735ms	56.982ms	57.186ms	57.299ms	1.26%	0.982	0.798	0.33%	0.013ms	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	throughput	15707.136op/s	15893.680op/s ± 52.106op/s	15904.680op/s ± 30.881op/s	15930.666op/s	15956.395op/s	15975.240op/s	15986.622op/s	0.52%	-0.964	0.748	0.33%	3.684op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.014ms	50.078ms ± 0.034ms	50.079ms ± 0.015ms	50.087ms	50.144ms	50.182ms	50.189ms	0.22%	0.928	1.216	0.07%	0.002ms	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	throughput	17932.166op/s	17971.888op/s ± 12.360op/s	17971.724op/s ± 5.406op/s	17979.151op/s	17988.900op/s	17990.696op/s	17994.955op/s	0.13%	-0.923	1.205	0.07%	0.874op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	execution_time	332.216µs	338.800µs ± 3.973µs	338.210µs ± 1.838µs	340.117µs	345.430µs	352.648µs	365.758µs	8.15%	2.574	12.492	1.17%	0.281µs	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	throughput	2460644.584op/s	2656788.605op/s ± 30291.645op/s	2661065.266op/s ± 14463.412op/s	2673674.406op/s	2693604.206op/s	2705404.276op/s	2709083.348op/s	1.80%	-2.314	10.490	1.14%	2141.943op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	56.675ms	57.122ms ± 0.197ms	57.092ms ± 0.130ms	57.242ms	57.477ms	57.554ms	57.758ms	1.17%	0.460	-0.266	0.34%	0.014ms	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	throughput	31164.547op/s	31511.667op/s ± 108.687op/s	31527.942op/s ± 71.687op/s	31590.746op/s	31671.910op/s	31696.312op/s	31760.043op/s	0.74%	-0.444	-0.286	0.34%	7.685op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.056ms	50.113ms ± 0.037ms	50.108ms ± 0.021ms	50.129ms	50.187ms	50.233ms	50.245ms	0.27%	1.269	1.733	0.07%	0.003ms	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	throughput	35824.690op/s	35918.912op/s ± 26.701op/s	35922.152op/s ± 15.379op/s	35938.179op/s	35951.489op/s	35956.300op/s	35959.574op/s	0.10%	-1.265	1.718	0.07%	1.888op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	execution_time	837.794µs	878.388µs ± 17.800µs	875.533µs ± 11.192µs	888.166µs	910.477µs	919.452µs	961.803µs	9.85%	0.799	1.596	2.02%	1.259µs	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	throughput	1871485.527op/s	2050033.274op/s ± 40950.940op/s	2055891.442op/s ± 26226.450op/s	2078914.824op/s	2104893.617op/s	2129993.652op/s	2148498.297op/s	4.50%	-0.632	1.030	1.99%	2895.669op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	57.079ms	57.496ms ± 0.139ms	57.488ms ± 0.082ms	57.566ms	57.742ms	57.875ms	57.972ms	0.84%	0.376	0.887	0.24%	0.010ms	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	throughput	62099.467op/s	62613.714op/s ± 151.634op/s	62621.710op/s ± 89.049op/s	62711.559op/s	62836.728op/s	62993.927op/s	63070.633op/s	0.72%	-0.357	0.872	0.24%	10.722op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.090ms	50.169ms ± 0.042ms	50.160ms ± 0.022ms	50.185ms	50.266ms	50.299ms	50.326ms	0.33%	1.287	1.676	0.08%	0.003ms	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	throughput	71533.798op/s	71757.505op/s ± 59.308op/s	71770.989op/s ± 31.335op/s	71800.315op/s	71827.003op/s	71839.479op/s	71870.659op/s	0.14%	-1.282	1.660	0.08%	4.194op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	execution_time	1.918ms	2.230ms ± 0.104ms	2.241ms ± 0.064ms	2.295ms	2.390ms	2.458ms	2.494ms	11.30%	-0.226	-0.041	4.67%	0.007ms	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	throughput	1443405.137op/s	1617731.728op/s ± 76984.795op/s	1606445.742op/s ± 46355.838op/s	1662497.101op/s	1760849.788op/s	1802178.948op/s	1877110.894op/s	16.85%	0.499	0.228	4.75%	5443.647op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	57.595ms	57.890ms ± 0.240ms	57.809ms ± 0.114ms	58.003ms	58.433ms	58.556ms	58.585ms	1.34%	1.188	0.488	0.41%	0.017ms	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	throughput	122898.288op/s	124375.461op/s ± 513.742op/s	124548.252op/s ± 244.829op/s	124746.222op/s	124923.469op/s	124975.536op/s	125010.509op/s	0.37%	-1.175	0.454	0.41%	36.327op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.203ms	50.299ms ± 0.077ms	50.276ms ± 0.031ms	50.334ms	50.431ms	50.527ms	50.856ms	1.15%	2.638	13.356	0.15%	0.005ms	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	throughput	141576.574op/s	143144.393op/s ± 217.122op/s	143210.258op/s ± 87.529op/s	143274.756op/s	143369.125op/s	143402.153op/s	143417.864op/s	0.14%	-2.600	12.987	0.15%	15.353op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	execution_time	5.862ms	6.467ms ± 0.107ms	6.481ms ± 0.062ms	6.543ms	6.598ms	6.630ms	6.662ms	2.81%	-1.587	5.131	1.64%	0.008ms	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	throughput	1080682.884op/s	1113657.973op/s ± 18895.202op/s	1111007.240op/s ± 10649.394op/s	1121541.191op/s	1150162.448op/s	1172016.355op/s	1228149.738op/s	10.54%	1.837	6.752	1.69%	1336.093op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[56.601ms; 56.653ms] or [-0.046%; +0.046%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[15886.459op/s; 15900.901op/s] or [-0.045%; +0.045%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.073ms; 50.083ms] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[17970.175op/s; 17973.601op/s] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[338.249µs; 339.351µs] or [-0.163%; +0.163%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	throughput	[2652590.474op/s; 2660986.735op/s] or [-0.158%; +0.158%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[57.095ms; 57.150ms] or [-0.048%; +0.048%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[31496.604op/s; 31526.730op/s] or [-0.048%; +0.048%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.108ms; 50.118ms] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[35915.211op/s; 35922.612op/s] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[875.921µs; 880.855µs] or [-0.281%; +0.281%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	throughput	[2044357.868op/s; 2055708.680op/s] or [-0.277%; +0.277%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[57.476ms; 57.515ms] or [-0.034%; +0.034%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[62592.699op/s; 62634.729op/s] or [-0.034%; +0.034%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.163ms; 50.175ms] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[71749.286op/s; 71765.725op/s] or [-0.011%; +0.011%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[2.216ms; 2.245ms] or [-0.648%; +0.648%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	throughput	[1607062.376op/s; 1628401.081op/s] or [-0.660%; +0.660%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[57.857ms; 57.924ms] or [-0.058%; +0.058%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[124304.261op/s; 124446.661op/s] or [-0.057%; +0.057%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.288ms; 50.310ms] or [-0.021%; +0.021%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[143114.302op/s; 143174.484op/s] or [-0.021%; +0.021%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[6.452ms; 6.482ms] or [-0.229%; +0.229%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	throughput	[1111039.280op/s; 1116276.666op/s] or [-0.235%; +0.235%]	None	None	None

Baseline

Baseline benchmark details

Group 1

cpu_model	git_commit_sha	git_commit_date	git_branch
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8259CL CPU @ 2.50GHz	`3c5ccac`	1788282925	main

scenario	metric	min	mean ± sd	median ± mad	p75	p95	p99	max	peak_to_median_ratio	skewness	kurtosis	cv	sem	runs	sample_size
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	56.308ms	56.624ms ± 0.198ms	56.588ms ± 0.107ms	56.707ms	56.998ms	57.470ms	57.513ms	1.63%	1.808	4.881	0.35%	0.014ms	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	throughput	15648.740op/s	15894.645op/s ± 55.372op/s	15904.354op/s ± 30.016op/s	15933.923op/s	15956.991op/s	15971.337op/s	15983.575op/s	0.50%	-1.770	4.688	0.35%	3.915op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.008ms	50.077ms ± 0.036ms	50.076ms ± 0.014ms	50.087ms	50.142ms	50.200ms	50.217ms	0.28%	1.442	3.259	0.07%	0.003ms	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	throughput	17922.147op/s	17972.296op/s ± 12.967op/s	17972.649op/s ± 4.908op/s	17979.136op/s	17989.188op/s	17990.496op/s	17997.290op/s	0.14%	-1.435	3.237	0.07%	0.917op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	execution_time	326.456µs	335.627µs ± 5.527µs	335.097µs ± 1.745µs	336.965µs	340.691µs	348.993µs	396.757µs	18.40%	6.980	73.380	1.64%	0.391µs	1	200
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	throughput	2268388.927op/s	2682200.263op/s ± 39990.757op/s	2685790.106op/s ± 13988.430op/s	2698787.128op/s	2726057.554op/s	2737660.616op/s	2756879.947op/s	2.65%	-5.774	55.992	1.49%	2827.774op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	56.568ms	57.120ms ± 0.220ms	57.095ms ± 0.137ms	57.260ms	57.559ms	57.628ms	57.634ms	0.94%	0.480	-0.240	0.38%	0.016ms	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	throughput	31231.752op/s	31512.954op/s ± 120.964op/s	31526.447op/s ± 75.907op/s	31601.468op/s	31674.851op/s	31727.121op/s	31820.042op/s	0.93%	-0.463	-0.252	0.38%	8.553op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.054ms	50.113ms ± 0.037ms	50.106ms ± 0.018ms	50.123ms	50.190ms	50.231ms	50.246ms	0.28%	1.379	1.897	0.07%	0.003ms	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	throughput	35823.790op/s	35918.702op/s ± 26.470op/s	35924.005op/s ± 12.812op/s	35936.769op/s	35949.745op/s	35956.231op/s	35961.140op/s	0.10%	-1.374	1.883	0.07%	1.872op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	execution_time	845.943µs	892.884µs ± 17.924µs	892.194µs ± 11.903µs	904.349µs	920.633µs	930.511µs	987.702µs	10.70%	0.695	3.017	2.00%	1.267µs	1	200
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	throughput	1822411.926op/s	2016737.818op/s ± 40030.017op/s	2017498.378op/s ± 26977.354op/s	2044260.613op/s	2076093.976op/s	2111552.037op/s	2127803.731op/s	5.47%	-0.447	2.028	1.98%	2830.550op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	57.163ms	57.468ms ± 0.153ms	57.450ms ± 0.095ms	57.549ms	57.749ms	57.893ms	57.965ms	0.90%	0.589	0.370	0.27%	0.011ms	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	throughput	62106.179op/s	62643.828op/s ± 166.666op/s	62663.375op/s ± 103.130op/s	62753.363op/s	62899.162op/s	62956.657op/s	62977.549op/s	0.50%	-0.572	0.343	0.27%	11.785op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.111ms	50.173ms ± 0.044ms	50.161ms ± 0.023ms	50.194ms	50.263ms	50.297ms	50.364ms	0.40%	1.171	1.392	0.09%	0.003ms	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	throughput	71479.231op/s	71752.181op/s ± 63.307op/s	71768.372op/s ± 33.231op/s	71796.401op/s	71825.204op/s	71840.828op/s	71840.944op/s	0.10%	-1.166	1.371	0.09%	4.477op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	execution_time	2.252ms	2.416ms ± 0.060ms	2.422ms ± 0.042ms	2.462ms	2.503ms	2.523ms	2.536ms	4.71%	-0.379	-0.403	2.47%	0.004ms	1	200
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	throughput	1419747.665op/s	1491208.627op/s ± 37360.110op/s	1486660.891op/s ± 25877.822op/s	1513890.031op/s	1559335.193op/s	1586851.509op/s	1598247.914op/s	7.51%	0.489	-0.253	2.50%	2641.759op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	57.550ms	57.905ms ± 0.245ms	57.829ms ± 0.149ms	58.058ms	58.354ms	58.538ms	58.592ms	1.32%	0.793	-0.387	0.42%	0.017ms	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	throughput	122882.844op/s	124342.774op/s ± 523.671op/s	124505.639op/s ± 322.042op/s	124771.591op/s	124947.527op/s	125006.863op/s	125109.562op/s	0.49%	-0.781	-0.412	0.42%	37.029op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	50.200ms	50.290ms ± 0.055ms	50.274ms ± 0.029ms	50.316ms	50.384ms	50.473ms	50.498ms	0.45%	1.362	2.071	0.11%	0.004ms	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	throughput	142578.970op/s	143168.970op/s ± 156.640op/s	143214.224op/s ± 81.849op/s	143276.214op/s	143343.831op/s	143389.109op/s	143426.678op/s	0.15%	-1.354	2.045	0.11%	11.076op/s	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	execution_time	6.022ms	6.439ms ± 0.122ms	6.467ms ± 0.083ms	6.534ms	6.604ms	6.636ms	6.658ms	2.96%	-0.592	-0.198	1.89%	0.009ms	1	200
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	throughput	1081390.235op/s	1118613.530op/s ± 21431.332op/s	1113425.650op/s ± 14302.278op/s	1134429.828op/s	1157038.679op/s	1171741.862op/s	1195539.178op/s	7.37%	0.677	-0.001	1.91%	1515.424op/s	1	200

scenario	metric	95% CI mean	Shapiro-Wilk pvalue	Ljung-Box pvalue (lag=1)	Dip test pvalue
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[56.596ms; 56.651ms] or [-0.049%; +0.049%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[15886.971op/s; 15902.319op/s] or [-0.048%; +0.048%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.072ms; 50.082ms] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[17970.499op/s; 17974.093op/s] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[334.861µs; 336.393µs] or [-0.228%; +0.228%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/1_senders/no_delay	throughput	[2676657.929op/s; 2687742.597op/s] or [-0.207%; +0.207%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[57.090ms; 57.151ms] or [-0.053%; +0.053%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[31496.189op/s; 31529.718op/s] or [-0.053%; +0.053%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.108ms; 50.118ms] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[35915.033op/s; 35922.370op/s] or [-0.010%; +0.010%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[890.400µs; 895.368µs] or [-0.278%; +0.278%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/2_senders/no_delay	throughput	[2011190.043op/s; 2022285.594op/s] or [-0.275%; +0.275%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[57.447ms; 57.489ms] or [-0.037%; +0.037%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[62620.730op/s; 62666.927op/s] or [-0.037%; +0.037%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.167ms; 50.179ms] or [-0.012%; +0.012%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[71743.407op/s; 71760.954op/s] or [-0.012%; +0.012%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[2.407ms; 2.424ms] or [-0.343%; +0.343%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay	throughput	[1486030.875op/s; 1496386.378op/s] or [-0.347%; +0.347%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	execution_time	[57.872ms; 57.939ms] or [-0.059%; +0.059%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/10us_delay	throughput	[124270.198op/s; 124415.350op/s] or [-0.058%; +0.058%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	execution_time	[50.283ms; 50.298ms] or [-0.015%; +0.015%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/1us_delay	throughput	[143147.261op/s; 143190.678op/s] or [-0.015%; +0.015%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	execution_time	[6.422ms; 6.456ms] or [-0.262%; +0.262%]	None	None	None
trace_buffer/8_senders/no_delay	throughput	[1115643.353op/s; 1121583.706op/s] or [-0.266%; +0.266%]	None	None	None

dd-octo-sts · 2026-09-01T18:01:20Z

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	8.39 MB	8.39 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	90.77 MB	90.77 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	101.99 MB	101.99 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	11.29 MB	11.29 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

libdatadog-x64-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	27.03 MB	27.03 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	96.08 KB	96.08 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	181.70 MB	181.73 MB	+.01% (+24.00 KB) 🔍
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	766.69 MB	766.69 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	8.91 MB	8.91 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	96.08 KB	96.08 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	26.05 MB	26.05 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	51.84 MB	51.84 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

libdatadog-x86-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	23.57 MB	23.57 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	97.58 KB	97.58 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	186.77 MB	186.79 MB	+0% (+16.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	754.57 MB	754.57 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	6.88 MB	6.88 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	97.58 KB	97.58 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	28.00 MB	28.00 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	49.34 MB	49.34 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	80.93 MB	80.93 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	9.33 MB	9.33 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	96.69 MB	96.69 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	11.37 MB	11.37 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

mabdinur · 2026-09-02T14:56:41Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-09-02T14:56:46Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-09-02 14:56:46 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-09-02 14:56:51 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 49m (p90).

2026-09-02 15:36:48 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

fix(data-pipeline): pass obfuscation config to OTLP stats

1e57bb1

Initialize the shared stats obfuscation configuration from the builder flag before the OTLP concentrator starts, and cover enabled and disabled SQL aggregation behavior. Refs APMAPI-2317.

mabdinur requested a review from a team as a code owner September 1, 2026 17:21

github-actions Bot added the data-pipeline label Sep 1, 2026

mabdinur requested a review from paullegranddc September 1, 2026 18:08

yannham approved these changes Sep 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress and removed mergequeue-status: queued labels Sep 2, 2026

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 1688816 into main Sep 2, 2026
119 of 125 checks passed

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the codex/apmapi-2317-otlp-stats-obfuscation branch September 2, 2026 15:36

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: done and removed mergequeue-status: in_progress labels Sep 2, 2026

Navigation Menu

Uh oh!

fix(data-pipeline): pass obfuscation config to OTLP stats - #2444

fix(data-pipeline): pass obfuscation config to OTLP stats#2444
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/apmapi-2317-otlp-stats-obfuscation

mabdinur commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited by atlassian Bot

Loading

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

Group 1

Group 1

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

mabdinur commented Sep 2, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

mabdinur commented Sep 1, 2026 • edited by atlassian Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What does this PR do?

Motivation

Additional Notes

How to test the change?

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

datadog-prod-us1-4 Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

pr-commenter Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Benchmarks

Comparison

Explanation

More details about the CI and significant changes

scenario:trace_buffer/4_senders/no_delay

Candidate

Group 1

Baseline

Group 1

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

Uh oh!

mabdinur commented Sep 2, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

mabdinur commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited by atlassian Bot

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

pr-commenter Bot commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Sep 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading