Skip to content

ai_automation: review with Claude Code or Codex instead of CodeRabbit - #208

Open
ndbroadbent wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
nathan/ai-review-without-coderabbit
Open

ndbroadbent wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
nathan/ai-review-without-coderabbit

Conversation

@ndbroadbent

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

CodeRabbit is uninstalled from DocSpring's repositories (3 Nov 2026), so the AI automation docs no longer tell the manager to run coderabbit review. The review step is now one AI code review per branch, with the whole repository as context: Claude Code's /code-review in the worktree, or codex review --uncommitted / codex review --base origin/main.

Docs only: ai_automation/README.md (step 7) and ai_automation/manager_prompt_template.txt (step 4).

…code-review) or Codex (codex review), with the whole repository as context, now that CodeRabbit is uninstalled
@deepsource-io

deepsource-io Bot commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

DeepSource Code Review

We reviewed changes in d8d0fc2...afbeb0e on this pull request. Below is the summary for the review, and you can see the individual issues we found as inline review comments.

See full review on DeepSource ↗

PR Report Card

Overall Grade   Security  

Reliability  

Complexity  

Hygiene  

Code Review Summary

Analyzer Status Updated (UTC) Details
JavaScript Nov 3, 2026 1:21a.m. Review ↗
Go Nov 3, 2026 1:21a.m. Review ↗

Important

AI Review is run only on demand for your team. We're only showing results of static analysis review right now. To trigger AI Review, comment @deepsourcebot review on this thread.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant