Introduce public API of rules_codechecker - #269
Open
nettle wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
furtib
added
enhancement
furtib
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2026
Why: Users should not load rules from the implementation files under src/, which exposes internals and deviates from the Bazel convention of a single defs.bzl entry point per rules repository. What: - Add defs.bzl exporting the user facing rules and macros - Switch README examples to @rules_codechecker//:defs.bzl - Switch unit and foss test BUILD files to the new load path - Keep clang_ctu_test and the internal codechecker rule in src/
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why:
Users should not load rules from the implementation files under src/,
which exposes internals and deviates from the Bazel convention
of a single defs.bzl entry point per rules repository.
What: