You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the 12 Feb meeting, the team agreed that the main catalogue navigation should use category-specific subcategories (unique to each top-level category) rather than cross-cutting topics that repeat across categories. Paula made a strong UX case that duplicating subcategories across parent categories is confusing for users and violates standard information architecture principles.
Cross-cutting topics (e.g. AI Lifecycle, Sustainability Metrics) will still exist but as tags for filtering and alternative browsing — not as navigation items.
What needs to happen
For each top-level category that has a long pattern list (Architecture has 14+), propose 2–3 unique subcategories that meaningfully reduce the list for scanning
Follow the rule of thumb: only create a subcategory if it would contain 3+ patterns; categories with ≤7–9 patterns can remain flat
Document the proposed subcategories in the patterns spreadsheet for team review
Confirm with the team that the cross-cutting topics list is complete and suitable for use as tags
Acceptance criteria
Every top-level category with >7 patterns has proposed subcategories
No subcategory name appears under more than one parent category
Cross-cutting topics are documented separately as the tag taxonomy
Team consensus reached via async review or next meeting
References
Meeting decision: Subcategorization approach agreed 12 Feb 2026
Related: Homepage will offer multiple browse routes (by category, by persona, by tag)
Activity