Skip to content

Scalar Calculation? #44

Description

@aminya

Now the library only supports doing a calculation on an Array and also returns an Array.

It may be worth while to define scalar methods too.

julia> IVM.sin(1.1)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching sin(::Float64)
You may have intended to import Base.sin
Closest candidates are:
  sin(::Array{Float32,N} where N) at C:\Users\yahyaaba\.julia\packages\IntelVectorMath\Gb348\src\setup.jl:72
  sin(::Array{Float64,N} where N) at C:\Users\yahyaaba\.julia\packages\IntelVectorMath\Gb348\src\setup.jl:72
Stacktrace:
 [1] top-level scope at none:0

This way we only use Intel for calculating one scalar number, which (if possible) helps to fuse for-loops with broadcasted functions and use @avx or @simd features of Julia instead for parallelization.

We should see if Intel provides scalar API. Because if it only provides Vector API, and the function call uses the Vector Processor Unit of the CPU, we cannot parallelize the function. This is like vectorizing an already vectorized function (although having a size of 1), which doesn't have an effect.

Related to #43, which can help to implement the 3rd macro.

This can also solve #22, by using Intel-only for a scalar call and provide an SVML like behavior using @avx or @simd.

Places to look into:

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions