Skip to content

Support rule-level confidence calibration #1156

Closed

Description

@mijinummi

Objective

Extend GasGuard's repository analysis platform with support rule-level confidence calibration. The implementation should fit the existing analyzer/API/worker architecture, preserve tenant isolation, and produce predictable results for supported repository inputs.

Scope

  • Workstream: Analyzer Architecture
  • Repository: MDTechLabs/GasGuard
  • Priority and owner: assign during triage
  • Define the behavior and configuration surface for support rule-level confidence calibration.
  • Integrate with the relevant analyzer, API, worker, persistence, or reporting boundary without coupling unrelated modules.
  • Specify behavior for unsupported input, partial failure, retries, and backward compatibility.

Acceptance criteria

  • Results remain deterministic for the same commit, configuration, and rule-pack version.
  • Fixtures cover at least one realistic repository case and one regression case.
  • Public interfaces, configuration, and failure semantics are documented.
  • Unit tests cover success, boundary, invalid-input, and failure cases.
  • Integration tests cover relevant component boundaries and persistence or RPC behavior.
  • Logs and metrics are actionable and exclude secrets, private keys, and sensitive payloads.
  • CI passes; the pull request links this issue and includes reproducible verification evidence.

Engineering notes

Prefer small, reviewable changes with explicit interfaces. Preserve existing behavior unless the issue intentionally changes it. Never commit secrets, access tokens, private keys, customer data, or sensitive production information.


Activity

  1. LayanGift commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @LayanGift

    @LayanGift has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    i can work on this

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @LayanGift to this issue.

  2. Nimatstar commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @Nimatstar
    Contributor

    @Nimatstar has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi am a software Engineer. Can i work on this

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @Nimatstar to this issue.

  3. RaymondAbiola commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @RaymondAbiola
    Contributor

    @RaymondAbiola has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    I’d like to take responsibility for this task. I’m comfortable working independently through an unfamiliar codebase and turning the issue requirements into a complete implementation. I’ll keep the changes focused and make sure the final result is ready for review.

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @RaymondAbiola to this issue.

  4. devzakari-sketch commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @devzakari-sketch
    Contributor

    @devzakari-sketch has applied to work on this issue as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th wave.

    Hi can i work on this?

    ℹ️ Repo Maintainers: To accept this application, review their application or assign @devzakari-sketch to this issue.

  5. drips-wave commented on Oct 17, 2026

    @drips-wave

    Congratulations, @RaymondAbiola! 🎉 Your application was accepted by the repo's maintainers, and the issue is due on October 22, 2026.

    🧑‍💻 @RaymondAbiola: Please resolve the issue such that the repo's maintainers have enough time to review your contribution before the due date. You'll earn Points for completing the issue on-time, which will make you eligible for a share of the Stellar Wave Program's reward pool.

    Warning

    When opening a PR, please link it to this issue to ensure it gets tracked accurately. Points are awarded when this issue is marked as completed by the maintainer.

    🤠 Repo maintainers: Please keep an eye on the contributor's progress and review their work before the due date. You can manage this issue, including adjusting its complexity and points, here.

    🌊 Happy Wave 🌊

  6. grantfox-oss commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @grantfox-oss

    🎉 This issue has been marked as completed on GrantFox!

    @RaymondAbiola's PR #1289 was approved and merged by @mijinummi.

    🏆 @RaymondAbiola: You earned 35 FoxPoints for this contribution! Your current tier: Explorer (892 total points). Track your full progress on GrantFox.

    👏 Great work, @RaymondAbiola! Keep contributing to MDTechLabs.

  7. drips-wave commented on Oct 21, 2026

    @drips-wave

    This issue has been completed by @RaymondAbiola as part of the Stellar Wave Program's 10th Wave 🥳

    😎 @RaymondAbiola: You earned 200 Points for completing this issue! Once the Wave's rewards are finalized, you'll be eligible for a percentage of the Wave's reward pool based on the percentage of total points you've earned. Learn more here. You can also Leave a review to share your experience working on this issue.

    🧑‍💻 Repo maintainers: How'd the contributor do? Leave a review to share your experience working with them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Stellar WaveIssues in the Stellar wave program

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions