fix(js-x-ray): match quoted property keys in findPropertyMatch - #703
Merged
fraxken merged 2 commits intoSep 1, 2026
Merged
Conversation
馃 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 8292236 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
PierreDemailly
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
fraxken
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
findPropertyMatchrequires!prop.computed && isIdentifier(prop.key), so a property key written as a string literal is skipped even though its name is statically known.Both build the same object at runtime, and
cost: 1024is well below the lowest OWASP row, so the second one was a miss.The key name is now resolved through a small
getPropertyNamehelper:{ cost: 1 }"cost"{ "cost": 1 }"cost"{ ["cost"]: 1 }"cost"{ [cost]: 1 }nullThe last row stays excluded. The real key is the value of
costat runtime, so it is not statically known. The existing test covering it still passes.isWeakScryptis the only probe using the helper today, so it is the only behaviour change. Added a regression test there, plus three cases on the helper itself.Split out of #699 as suggested on Discord, so it can land independently.