[echoix]

CodeQL Code Quality had some AI findings on a recently changed file, a test file for g.md2man. The tests suggested seemed legitimate, and they are passing. I am thus submitting them here, after testing them in my fork.

Original text explaining the findings:

---

The test asserts that there are exactly 3 bullet list markers for the input "- first\n- second\n - nested\n", but this input only has 3 items (first, second, nested). The assertion == 3 may be correct, but it should be verified that the nested item also produces the same .IP \(bu 4n marker, since nested items could produce a different marker format. If the nested list intentionally uses the same marker, this is fine, but the test name test_unordered_list_nested suggests the nesting behavior is what's being tested, and there is no assertion verifying that the nested item is actually rendered as nested (e.g., inside .RS/.RE blocks relative to the parent items). Consider adding an assertion that checks the order of .RS, .IP, and .RE to confirm correct nesting structure.

---

The test_comment_parsing_unit test covers multi-line and inline comments, but there is no unit test for strip_html_comments behavior inside a fenced code block (i.e., that a comment inside a fence is preserved). The integration test test_comment_kept_in_fenced_code covers this via subprocess, but a direct unit test of strip_html_comments with a fenced block containing a comment would provide more precise coverage of that branch in gmd.py.