Repository navigation
Use published Brotli backports in current catalog revisions - #23
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add eight numeric template revisions for the published Preloader v0.3.4, Healthcheck v0.3.19, DNS v0.17.15, Scheduler v0.8.22 and IPsec v0.14.42 images. Record each exact producer, OCI digest, published SBOM, original/effective scan and checksum-bound backport installation evidence; attestation fields reflect what each component workflow actually provides.
Existing numeric revisions and image records remain unchanged. Compose changes only the relevant image tags; localized questions, resource parameters, firewall choices, ownership and Native project references are preserved. Current documentation and Catalog Service assertions follow the new defaults, while source-transition checks retain the previous revisions.
Validation: local version-label, firewall, syntax, source preservation and original-LF deployable-image checks passed. Required Linux Catalog CI passed 56 tests (1 intentionally deselected by the existing workflow), with 0 deployable-image blockers, 22 templates and 142 localized questions. Both CodeQL analyses and the aggregate check passed. Component publication does not assert managed-host adoption or a new runtime matrix.