Skip to content

FOUR-32790 Unit Test Implementation for sequential Script/Service tasks - #9017

Merged
nolanpro merged 4 commits into
developfrom
FOUR-32790
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

nolanpro merged 4 commits into
developfrom
FOUR-32790

Conversation

@devmiguelangel

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel commented Aug 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue & Reproduction Steps

Unit Test Implementation for sequential Script/Service tasks

Solution

  • Execute eligible sequential script and service tasks inline within the current job.
  • Preserve asynchronous execution for collaborations, call activities, boundary events, multi-instance tasks, parallel flows, and custom queues.
  • Add context-reuse and pending-job safety guards.

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-32790

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel self-assigned this Aug 27, 2026
@decisions-sonarqube

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pmPaulis
pmPaulis requested a review from caleeli August 28, 2026 01:10
@nolanpro
nolanpro merged commit ef57102 into develop Aug 31, 2026
10 of 15 checks passed
@nolanpro
nolanpro deleted the FOUR-32790 branch August 31, 2026 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants