FOUR-33295: [53481] MySql error - Syntax error or access violation in the query of groups table

[pmPaulis]

Issue & Reproduction Steps

[53481] MySql error - Syntax error or access violation in the query of groups table

Related Tickets & Packages

• https://processmaker.atlassian.net/browse/FOUR-30871

Code Review Checklist

• I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
• This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
• This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
• This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
• This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
• This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
• This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
• This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
• This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Single-character-level SQL quoting change on an existing query path; a new unit test covers nested group resolution with no auth or data-model changes.

Overview
Fixes a MySQL syntax/access violation when resolving assignable users from nested groups on the raw execution path by quoting the table name in mergeGroupMemberUserIdsRaw (FROM groups → FROM `groups` ), since groups is treated as a reserved identifier in the failing query.

Adds testRawGroupAssignmentResolvesActiveNestedGroups, which exercises that private method via reflection and asserts a user in a child group is returned when assignment starts from a parent group.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 41c4029. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[caleeli]

consider to use DB::table if possible

[decisions-sonarqube]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube