Repository navigation
docs(advisor): scope consent to exact requests and define provenance - #30
Merged
Scaxlibur merged 1 commit intoOct 10, 2026
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The Draft advisor RFC allowed reusable consent when local state fields changed without defining how Core could independently verify the corresponding provider body changes. The first version now authorizes only the exact prepared request per invocation. It retains the existing bounded run snapshot binding and verification implementation, while documenting the provider adapter's mapping tests and the remaining runtime integration work.
The capture-triage contract now specifies required/optional fields, provenance ownership and allowed shapes, including a valid example without
operator_note. Provider confidence is optional to Core and remains separate from the generic versioned display metrics; adapters can enforce their provider's native response fields. The RFC and navigation continue to mark the design as Draft.Validation: 52 run-binding tests passed, 1 POSIX-only test skipped; default scoped strict documentation audit reports 0 errors and 0 warnings, generated Reference is current, strict MkDocs build and whitespace checks pass. No runtime source changes or instrument I/O are included.
All five GitHub checks passed for
ce499ba: Linux Python 3.11/3.12, Windows Python 3.11/3.12, and documentation build. Target branch:Dev. The RFC remains Draft; advisor runtime integration and provider service validation are still pending.