Skip to content

docs(liquidity-launchpad): update deployments page for v3.3.0, add Arc chain - #1159

Closed
claude[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/launchpad-arc-v3-3-0-deployments
Closed

claude[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/launchpad-arc-v3-3-0-deployments

Conversation

@claude

@claude claude Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Requested by Eric Zhong · Slack thread

Summary

Before: A reader of the deployments page sees the launchpad contract tables frozen at older releases — LiquidityLauncher at v3.0.0, LBPStrategy at v3.0.0 on six chains, and the v2.0.0 LBP strategy factories presented as current — with no Arc chain anywhere and none of the newer strategy or periphery contracts.

After: The page lists the current canonical liquidity-launcher deployments: LiquidityLauncher v3.2.0, LBPStrategy v3.3.0 on all 11 chains including Arc, and new sections for InstantLaunchStrategy, UniversalRouterStrategy, TokenSplitter, FeeSplitter, UERC20BeneficiaryVault, CompoundingClaimRecipient, BuybackAndBurnRecipient, VestingClaimRecipient, and InitializerHook, each with their Arc rows where deployed. The two Arc InstantLaunchStrategy deployments are labeled "with creator fees" (0x78429369103a9b8a545d11705bf04b4A4403fcc2) and "without creator fees" (0xA5FFB8B08429a95A75a893717049b6c8A8d5e961). The retired v2.0.0 LBP strategy factories move under Previous Deployments, and a note points to the liquidity-launcher Deployment Guide for prior (deprecated) addresses. ContinuousClearingAuction tables are untouched.

How: every address, commit hash, salt, and parameter was copied verbatim from the liquidity-launcher README's v3.3.0 deployment tables (provided by Eric Zhong); the Arc creator-fee labels come from Eric Zhong as well.

Type of change

  • Fix (typo, broken link, incorrect or outdated content)
  • New content (guide, page, code example)
  • Update to existing content
  • Other

How has this been verified?

Scripted cross-check between the source README tables and the edited page: all 41 addresses, 9 salts, 7 commit hashes, and every parameter/tick value match exactly in both directions, with no extras and no occurrence-count differences, and all 51 (version, chain, address) row triples are identical — so no value was retyped incorrectly and no chain/address pairing was swapped. The Arc creator-fee labels are consistent with the rows' Fee Splitters: the "with creator fees" deployment pins the splitter that routes 40% to the UERC20BeneficiaryVault, the "without" one pins the 100%-compounding splitter.

Applicable screenshots

N/A (table content change only).

Anything else reviewers should know?

  • The Robinhood Chain InstantLaunchStrategy pair's Fee Splitters differ the same way as Arc's (40%-vault vs. 100%-compounding), but the with/without creator-fee labels were stated only for Arc — do the same labels apply to the Robinhood pair? If so we can fill in that column.
  • Per the README's convention that prior deployments live in the Deployment Guide (deprecated), the old LiquidityLauncher v3.0.0/v1.0.0 rows and LBPStrategy v3.0.0 rows were replaced rather than kept; flag if you'd rather retain them on the page.
  • The source tables carry no chain-id column, so Arc's chain id is not asserted anywhere in this change.
  • Out of scope but noticed: the CCA factory table lists v2.0.0 as latest while a v2.1.0 tag exists in continuous-clearing-auction.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_0122eZQwseo71DXXYqGUACYi

…c chain

Sync the launchpad deployments page with the liquidity-launcher
README's canonical deployment tables: LiquidityLauncher v3.2.0,
LBPStrategy v3.3.0 across all 11 chains including Arc, and new
sections for InstantLaunchStrategy, UniversalRouterStrategy,
TokenSplitter, FeeSplitter, UERC20BeneficiaryVault,
CompoundingClaimRecipient, BuybackAndBurnRecipient,
VestingClaimRecipient, and InitializerHook. Move the retired v2.0.0
LBP strategy factories under Previous Deployments. CCA tables are
unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0122eZQwseo71DXXYqGUACYi
@claude
claude Bot requested a review from zhongeric September 15, 2026 03:57
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for contributing to Uniswap Docs! 🦄

Quick heads up on how this repo works: the docs you see on developers.uniswap.org are built from a separate source repo. When we accept a change here, we port it over there, so your fix might show up on the live site before it lands in this repo.

Updates to this repo come in batches on a regular cadence. When yours is included, you'll be credited as a co-author on the commit, so the contribution counts on your GitHub profile and in Uniswap/docs.

We review every PR but can't merge everything. Either way, someone from the docs team will follow up here once we've taken a look.

One legal bit: by submitting a PR you agree your contribution is licensed under the repo's MIT license.

…aunchStrategy deployments

Per Eric Zhong: 0x78429369103a9b8a545d11705bf04b4A4403fcc2 is the Arc
instant launch deployment with creator fees, and
0xA5FFB8B08429a95A75a893717049b6c8A8d5e961 is the one without.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0122eZQwseo71DXXYqGUACYi
@claude

claude Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Closing this PR: Uniswap/docs is the ported mirror of the developer docs, not the repo that builds developers.uniswap.org. The live site is built from Uniswap/universe (apps/dev-portal/content/docs/), so this change has been resubmitted there as https://github.com/Uniswap/universe/pull/42158.


Generated by Claude Code

@claude claude Bot closed this Sep 15, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant