docs: audit Desktop and frontend references - #4810
Open
jackeyfaker77 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Refs apache#3522. Generated-by: OpenAI Codex
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
@maka/uiimplementation.!importantexception policy.Refs #3522
Verification
npm run astryx:surface-inventory— 249 files, 0 blockers, 0 reimplementations, 1 polish item, 248 aligned.npm run astryx:surface-inventory:test— 19/19 tests passed.node apps/desktop/scripts/check-renderer-architecture.mjs— passed.git diff --check— passed.npm run check:renderer-architecture— 97/98 fixture tests passed; the single failure is Windows path normalization of a POSIX-only/fixture/...fixture test input. The actual renderer architecture checker above passes..bika-*staging directories are unrelated to this PR.Checklist
Documentation-only change; Biome ignores Markdown and no product runtime typecheck was required. All relevant generator and architecture checks pass as reported above.
Does this PR entail a change in behavior?