Docs/csm 359 - #18
Conversation
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ Deployment failed View logs |
appcircle-docs | ab1dbc2 | Jul 28 2026, 02:13 PM |
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ Deployment failed View logs |
appcircle-docs | ab1dbc2 | Jul 28 2026, 02:14 PM |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe billing documentation renames the publishes metric to “Publish to Stores,” links to detailed guidance, and explains which operations increase usage and how publish reports relate to usage counts. ChangesBilling usage guidance
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/account/my-organization/billing/index.md`:
- Line 62: Update the waiting-publish sentence in the billing documentation to
use the product’s exact status label “Canceled,” replacing the inconsistent
“canceled” spelling while preserving the surrounding prose.
- Line 27: Update the Publish to Stores metric description and the related
Publish Usage Details section to clarify that the value counts only publish
operations included in usage, excluding waiting, intermediate-step, and
never-picked-up jobs; avoid wording that implies every initiated attempt is
counted.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 97a1d02a-7c09-42fa-8baf-63bc76d82b89
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/account/my-organization/billing/index.md
| - **[Code Push Updates](/code-push)** : The number of devices receiving CodePush updates within a single billing cycle. | ||
| - **[Testing Distribution](/testing-distribution/testing-portal)** : Number of app downloads from the Testing Portal in a single billing cycle. | ||
| - **[Publishes](/publish-to-stores-module)** : Number of publishes initiated from the Publish module in a single billing cycle. | ||
| - **[Publish to Stores](/publish-to-stores-module)** : Number of publishes initiated from the Publish module in a single billing cycle. For the operations that count against this number, see [Publish Usage Details](#publish-usage-details). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Align the metric description with the counting rules.
“Number of publishes initiated” implies every attempt counts, but the new section says waiting, intermediate-step, and never-picked-up jobs do not increase usage. Describe this as the number of publish operations counted toward usage, or explicitly qualify “initiated.”
Also applies to: 45-63
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/account/my-organization/billing/index.md` at line 27, Update the Publish
to Stores metric description and the related Publish Usage Details section to
clarify that the value counts only publish operations included in usage,
excluding waiting, intermediate-step, and never-picked-up jobs; avoid wording
that implies every initiated attempt is counted.
|
|
||
| The Publish Report lists every publish attempt, so an entry in the report does not always mean that your usage increased. | ||
|
|
||
| - Waiting publishes appear in the Publish Report without affecting usage. If a waiting publish is canceled or times out before it starts, only its status is updated in the report and usage does not increase. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Use one cancellation spelling consistently.
This page uses “cancelled” on Line 32 but “canceled” here. Prefer the product’s exact status label, Canceled, while keeping surrounding prose consistent.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~62-~62: Do not mix variants of the same word (‘canceled’ and ‘cancelled’) within a single text.
Context: ...ffecting usage. If a waiting publish is canceled or times out before it starts, only its...
(EN_EXACT_COHERENCY_RULE)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@docs/account/my-organization/billing/index.md` at line 62, Update the
waiting-publish sentence in the billing documentation to use the product’s exact
status label “Canceled,” replacing the inconsistent “canceled” spelling while
preserving the surrounding prose.
Source: Linters/SAST tools
|
@SarpBakis23 I can not see details the error I do not have access on cloudflare. I apporoved the changes after my review. But please review as well after preview link is worked properly. |
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit