Skip to content

Add a 2026-11-03 update to the case study #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
g4lb merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

Add a 2026-11-03 update to the case study #3

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions docs/case-study.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
A real run of `autor3search-java` against a real, maintained, third-party Java
library. Every number here was measured; nothing is illustrative.

> **Update, 2026-11-03: this run counts as failed.** The changes were re-measured
> on current upstream. Escape-heavy strings got 10–64% slower. The benchmarks in
> this run missed these inputs. A slowdown on any real input counts as a failed
> optimization, so these changes were not sent upstream.

## Setup

| | |
Expand Down
Loading