Repository navigation
fix(tui): keep a to-do row's status word when its title is long - #7033
Conversation
The work surface gives a row's label the whole width and the detail only what is left, dropping it under four columns. A to-do whose title fills the strip lost its status word, so at 80 columns the in-progress step, the one most worth reading, showed as a bare truncated title. To-do rows (the `graph:` ids the strip already numbers) now reserve the detail's width, at most half the row, before the title is truncated. Titles that fit render as before and the full title stays in the hover. Other rows still give the label the room, so the Context budget row keeps its numbers ahead of the /context hint. Signed-off-by: Lstarsky0 <59827030+Lstarsky0@users.noreply.github.com>
![claude[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1236702?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
github-actions
Bot
added
the
contribution-gate
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 90a4a174a8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| let prefix_width = UnicodeWidthStr::width(prefix.as_str()); | ||
| let row_width = usize::from(content_area.width); | ||
| let label_budget = row_width.saturating_sub(prefix_width).max(1); | ||
| let detail_room = if row.id.0.starts_with("graph:") { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the Tasks view is rendered as a Left/Right rail with at least 44 content columns, project_visible deliberately retains Operation and Blocker nodes alongside plan steps (crates/tui/src/tui/work_surface/model.rs:694-711), while graph_node_row assigns all of them a graph: ID (model.rs:2695-2740). This condition consequently takes up to half the row away from long non-to-do titles to show state · kind, so wide side rails change even though the patch is meant to preserve the label-first layout for other rows; test the node kind (or confine the reservation to the strip) instead of treating every graph row as a to-do.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
On a side rail the tasks view also lists the graph's operation and blocker nodes, which share the `graph:` id prefix with to-dos, so the reservation took up to half a wide rail from their titles to show their `state · kind` detail. Check the plan-step ids the strip's filter already uses instead of the prefix, so those rows keep the label-first layout and to-dos keep their status words in every placement. Signed-off-by: Lstarsky0 <59827030+Lstarsky0@users.noreply.github.com>
|
🤖 This reply is from Claude Opus 5.5, an AI agent working on behalf of the Codewhale maintainers. It is posted through @Hmbown's account, but Hunter did not write it. Thanks @Lstarsky0. The row that lost its status word was the in-progress to-do, the one most worth reading, and reserving the detail's width before truncating the title brings "in progress" back. Switching from the |
Every 0.10.2 line now sits under [0.10.2] > Latest fixes in user voice: the proxy-aware install guard, local-state link hardening, the two command-splitter fixes, read-only network (#7040), MCP status and plugin servers at session start (#7035), plugin vocabulary and the marketplace pin 2e3a6fb (#7036), the declared output limit and published reasoning levels (#6396), #6955, #6978, #7007, #6478, the thread read marker (#6164), the stale Runtime owner record, HarmonyOS docs and npm (#1072), the three web-tool fixes (#7038, #7039, #6969), and the Lstarsky0 fixes #7030, #7033 and #7034. Internal tracker ids are removed from the public section, the citation line references #7039, Maintenance records the mirrors and the CI lane, and Contributors adds the six report helpers. crates/tui/CHANGELOG.md is regenerated with sync-changelog.sh; docs/CONTRIBUTORS.md and web/lib/release-credits.ts carry the same credits; web/data/agent-docs.generated.json and features.generated.json are regenerated from the landed docs and registry. Batch evidence (one combined tree, input hash a47518092a4c49de37d93381d392aec4fc4c28fd612f6e6192d327acf4736d95; the intermediate commits of this batch were not compiled on their own, only the combined tree): cargo fmt --check clean; tui lib nextest over the lane filters 4096 passed, 0 failed, plus 1268 passed after the changelog edit; fp55 shared-process cargo test 161 passed, 0 failed, 1 ignored; tui integration install::/skill_cli:: 42 passed, 0 failed; conformance goldens regenerated, 33 passed; execpolicy 89 command_safety and 256 crate tests passed; lane 74; runtime continual_harness 8; config private_directory 12, route/models_dev 121, configured_models 9; app-server daemon_client 1, daemon_socket 15; localization 54; clippy -D warnings on tui, execpolicy, lane, runtime, app-server and config clean with CI's exact flags (the plan's stricter run flagged 26 pre-existing sites outside the batch: 25 are lints CI allows, one collapsible_if is fixed in this batch); cargo check tui --all-targets clean (a first run failed on a half-applied call-site change of the citation fix; the rerun after the fix passed); aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu check of tui, app-server and config not run: the ring and libdbus-sys build scripts fail for the cross target on this Mac, so the Linux-only bubblewrap and boot-id paths were not type-checked here and need a Linux host; blocking-call budget 540 sites within budget; dead-code budget 214 at budget; sync-changelog --check, check-versions, check-bundled-plugin-claims, sync-marketplace --check and web check-facts all passed; npm wrapper node --test 101 passed, 0 failed. No hosted CI ran; final validation owns that. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
What and why
The work surface gives a row's label the whole width and the detail only what is left, and drops the detail under four columns. A to-do whose title fills the strip loses its status word. With a three-step to-do list at 80×24, before:
After:
The step that lost its word is the in-progress one, the row most worth reading.
todo_rows_carry_their_status_wordsalready pins that the words are projected and painted; this keeps them painted when the title is long. Plan-step (to-do) rows, picked by the sameplan_step_row_idsset the strip's filter uses, now reserve the detail's width, capped at half the row, before the title is truncated. A title that fits renders as before, and the hover still carries the full title.Other rows keep giving the label the room. I tried the reservation on every row first, and at 60 columns the Context budget row cut its numbers (
6.5k of 128.0k · 5% · com...) to show more of the/context for the full source maphint, so it stays on to-do rows only. The first version keyed on thegraph:id prefix; on a side rail that also matched the operation and blocker nodes listed under the to-dos, so the second commit checks the plan-step ids instead and those rows keep the label-first layout. Background task rows (status · id) aren't changed either.Issue
No-Issue: a long to-do title drops its status word in the work surface; I searched and found no issue for it
How I tested it
read,file_searchand a three-itemtodo_write, with this change and with a build from before it. The screens above are 80×24. At 60×16 the in-progress row goes fromSearch the workspace for every README and compare...toSearch the workspace for every READM... in progress; at 48×16 row 1 goes from...in place of its word tocompleted, and row 2 gainsin progress. At 120×30, where the titles fit, the strip is unchanged.work_surface_placement = "left"and a 60-column rail, main dropsin progressfrom the long row and this shows it; theRead 1 files · Searched 1 patternsrow under the to-dos is unchanged. The strip rows are the same with and without the second commit. I couldn't get the mock to produce an operation or blocker node, so for those rows I'm relying on the id check: they take the same path as on main.cargo fmt --all -- --check,cargo clippy -p codewhale-tui --all-targets --all-featureswith CI's flags, andcargo check -p codewhale-tui --all-targets: clean. Clippy also on 1.99, pluscargo +1.89.0 check -p codewhale-tui.cargo nextest run -p codewhale-tui --lib: 15347 passed, none failed, including the work surface tests and the shared-body-vs-frozen-body comparison.Checklist
maincargo fmt --allpasses, and tests cover new or changed behaviordocs/features.toml(cargo test -p codewhale-tui --test feature_registrychecks it) — n/a