Makefile: use $LIBEXECDIR when installing bootupd - #1161
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
Understand this PR’s impact Explore downstream dependencies and potential security impact with Blast Radius. Important Review skippedThe saved review base belongs to an older reviewed commit. This saved history cannot establish the base for an incremental review. Comment You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: coreos/bootupd/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📜 Recent review details⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (27)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe install target now creates the ChangesBuild and CI updates
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Change: Bug fix Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
04b2cc5 to
0b4bebc
Compare
|
|
The symlink creation used a hardcoded ../libexec/bootupd path,
potentially breaking installs where LIBEXECDIR differs from
${PREFIX}/libexec. Use ln -srf with $(LIBEXECDIR) to compute the correct
relative path.
0b4bebc to
e201323
Compare
The symlink creation used a hardcoded
../libexec/bootupdpath, potentially breaking installs whereLIBEXECDIRdiffers from${PREFIX}/libexec. Useln -srfwith$(LIBEXECDIR)to compute the correct relative path.Suggested by coderabbit in #1138 (review), seems reasonable but was unrelated to the change there.