Repository navigation
Use SPDX license identifiers for Hex publishing - #70
Merged
Merged
Conversation
2 similar comments
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hex rejects the 3.0.0 upload because
Public Domain (unlicense)is not a valid license identifier. Use the SPDX namesUnlicenseandBSD-3-Clausefor the existing Unlicense and New BSD entries;WTFPLalready has the correct identifier.Follow-up to #68. This updates the package metadata to match Hex's license requirements and the SPDX identifiers for Unlicense and New BSD.
Validation
mix format --check-formattedmix hex.build --output /tmp/graphmath-3.0.0-spdx.tar: builds without license warnings; inspected the tarball metadata to confirm all three identifiers.mix coveralls --seed 0: 597 tests, 7 doctests, no failures, 100% library line coverage.