chore(test): drop the stale podman mention from the capability comment - #125
Conversation
The comment above the CapAdd assertion in the compose feature-security test credited capability-name normalization to "Docker/podman". The podman backend is gone (#124) and this test drives Docker only — newEngineWith builds a *docker.Runtime (test/integration/ image_source_test.go:51) — so name just the backend that is actually under test. Comment only; no behavior change. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: 0 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 2 reviews per hour. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request updates one comment in the Compose security integration test. The comment now states that Docker normalizes capability names in inspect output. ChangesCompose security test
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This PR only corrects a stale backend reference in a test comment and does not change product behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains. Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![dap-code-review-by-crunchloop[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/97309830?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review — head c591f83
Reviewed PR #125 at head c591f83 (1 changed file, 1 commit; detached checkout was required because gh pr checkout 125 could not set up tracking for the fetched PR ref). Read the base-commit review directive, CONTRIBUTING.md, design/README.md, the full changed integration test, its newEngineWith caller/helper, Docker runtime container creation/inspection, and the Moby client capability-normalization source. The change is a one-line comment correction with no behavior change, and I found no verified findings. D11/R8 and the relevant Docker-backend/test context were covered; migration, tenancy, event flow, lifecycle, cache determinism, and other behavior dimensions were not implicated by this comment-only diff. The directive references PRD.md, but that file does not exist at the directives base SHA.
Verdict
CLEAN — this round found nothing.
1 participant
Last dangling
podmanreference outside the CHANGELOG, left over from #124.The comment above the
CapAddassertion in the compose feature-security test credited capability-name normalization to "Docker/podman". The podman backend is gone, and this test drives Docker only —newEngineWithbuilds a*docker.Runtime(test/integration/image_source_test.go:51) — so the comment now names just the backend actually under test.Comment only; no behavior change.
make lint testis green (golangci-lint: 0 issues).Deliberately not included
Two other
podmanmentions survive indesign/compose-native.md— the layering diagram'sfuture: podman, containerd, etc.label (§1) and the dated socktainer considered, rejected (2026-05-14) record (§11.2). Both are left alone on purpose:design/README.mdrecords that the design docs reflect the state of the world when they were written, that the code is authoritative when a record disagrees withmain, and that sections calling out alternatives, probe results or "future work" are kept because the reasoning stays useful. #124 already applied that rule — it deleteddesign/podman-backend.mdalong with the code but leftcompose-native.mduntouched. Editing them now would falsify a historical record against a documented convention.The
examples/applecontainer-spike/entry in.gitignoreis also untouched: it is still live while the Apple backend is in-tree, and belongs with that removal.Summary by CodeRabbit