docs: updated server references to include Armadillo

[timcadman]

Some stray references to Opal server in docs - updated to be "Armadillo/Opal"

[github-actions]

❌ 2 of 5 checks failed

Check	Result
Devtools checks	✅ passed
Code quality	⏳ pending
Armadillo unit tests	❌ [ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 27 | PASS 12395 ]
Opal unit tests	❌ [ FAIL 24 | WARN 0 | SKIP 27 | PASS 11752 ]
Test coverage	ℹ️ no coverable lines changed (project: 66.8%)

Tested against dsBase versions:
Armadillo: 7.0.0.9000
Opal: 7.0.0.9000

Logs: Devtools checks · pending · Armadillo unit tests · Opal unit tests · Codecov

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.83%. Comparing base (e10eaa3) to head (f7e40e7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           v7.0-dev     #714   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     66.83%   66.83%           
=========================================
  Files           142      142           
  Lines          5813     5813           
=========================================
  Hits           3885     3885           
  Misses         1928     1928           

Flag	Coverage Δ
armadillo-arg	21.02% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-misc	15.60% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-perf-1	5.78% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-perf-2	17.18% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-perf-3	15.99% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-smk-1	34.28% <ø> (ø)
armadillo-smk-2	37.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[StuartWheater]

• Changes are more accurate