docs: fix _merge_super_component_pipelines return description - #13011
Conversation
|
@Morningstar202604 is attempting to deploy a commit to the deepset Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Hi @Morningstar202604, thanks a lot for your contribution! 🙏 We noticed that the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) check ( To get your PR reviewed, please sign the CLA via the link in the |
|
Thanks for signing the CLA, @Morningstar202604! 🎉 This PR is now ready for review again and the reviewer has been re-assigned. |
Coverage reportClick to see where and how coverage changed
This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixes #12656.
Corrects the
:returns:section of_merge_super_component_pipelinesto match the actual signature (tuple[networkx.MultiDiGraph, dict[str, str]]):dict[str, str]mapping component names to their SuperComponent name),Docs-only change, no behavior or tests affected (per the maintainer's note in the issue).
Disclosure: I used AI tools to help draft this change.