Repository navigation
Research verification: reproduce ASSISTments experiment and test robust baselines - #1
devissaputra wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
…nloadable evidence
Completed empirical verification (22 October 2026)GitHub Actions run: https://github.com/devissaputra/knowledge_tracing_benchmark/actions/runs/39655888620 Pass: Automated tests, end-to-end original real-data experiment, extended 25-epoch-budget GRU/PFA robustness experiment, and output validation.
Release caveats: All robustness tests reuse a previously inspected fixed test partition, so findings are exploratory rather than confirmatory. The enriched PFA gets cross-skill summary counts, not the ordered full history available to GRU; architecture is not isolated. The pinned mirror has not been reconciled with official corrected ASSISTments rows. No independent dataset/generalization evaluation. These are verified empirical outputs, not by themselves evidence of arXiv readiness. Please retain this PR as draft until source provenance and manuscript claims are checked by the author. |
Draft verification branch. Adds a real-data robustness runner (25-epoch GRU, richer PFA baseline, paired learner-cluster bootstrap) and a GitHub Actions job to rerun both original and extended experiments. Do not merge or use newly generated outcomes in the manuscript until CI data verification passes and the author reviews the evidence. Dataset mirror provenance remains an independent release gate.