fix(MESHAGEN-004-2): CU-86akbhhdk 2 review findings in crowdsec.js

[flamingo]

Closes 2 review findings in crowdsec.js.

Draft — this is a starting point, not a finished change. The fix required judgment, so read it before trusting it.

#	Fix confidence	Finding	Location
1	🔴 55 low — review closely	crowdsec.js missing required Apache 2.0 license header	crowdsec.js:1
2	🟡 60 medium	crowdsec.js missing jshint directives and 'use strict'	crowdsec.js:1

What changed — and what was deliberately left — is explained per finding as inline review comments on the lines each finding touched.

---

Run: https://product-hub.flamingo.so/admin/code-review
Run id: a271a374-6235-40d2-8fdd-b6d4de951f4b

Merging this PR is recorded as acceptance of the rule that produced it;
closing it unmerged is recorded as rejection. Both feed rule health, so
closing a wrong suggestion is useful rather than merely tidy.

ClickUp task: CU-86akbhhdk MeshCentral webauthn and plugin JS fixes (15 PRs)

[flamingo]

🦩 What this fix changed, finding by finding

2 finding(s) fixed in this draft — 2 explained inline on the diff; 1 low-confidence hunk(s) need close review before merging.

[flamingo]

🦩 🔴 crowdsec.js missing required Apache 2.0 license header

Added an Apache 2.0 license/copyright block comment at the very top of crowdsec.js, matching the header convention used in sibling files like amtscript.js/amt-mei.js. Exact copyright year/holder wording could not be verified against the project's canonical header text, so the boilerplate used here is a best-effort approximation and should be checked against the actual standard header used elsewhere in the repo.

🤖 Prompt for AI agents

In crowdsec.js around line 1, review and complete this code-review fix: crowdsec.js missing required Apache 2.0 license header.
What the draft fix changed: Added an Apache 2.0 license/copyright block comment at the very top of crowdsec.js, matching the header convention used in sibling files like amtscript.js/amt-mei.js. Exact copyright year/holder wording could not be verified against the project's canonical header text, so the boilerplate used here is a best-effort approximation and should be checked against the actual standard header used elsewhere in the repo.
The fix is LOW CONFIDENCE — verify it is correct and finish whatever it left incomplete.

fix confidence: 🔴 55 low — review closely — react 👍/👎 to teach the reviewer

[flamingo]

🦩 🟠 crowdsec.js missing jshint directives and 'use strict'

Added /*jslint node: true */, /*jshint node: true */ directive comments and "use strict"; immediately after the license header and before the module.exports.CreateCrowdSecBouncer declaration, following the file-header convention described for amtscript.js. The exact jshint/jslint directive flags used in amtscript.js were not visible to me, so the specific directive options may differ slightly from the sibling file's actual content.

🤖 Prompt for AI agents

In crowdsec.js around line 1, review and complete this code-review fix: crowdsec.js missing jshint directives and 'use strict'.
What the draft fix changed: Added `/*jslint node: true */`, `/*jshint node: true */` directive comments and `"use strict";` immediately after the license header and before the `module.exports.CreateCrowdSecBouncer` declaration, following the file-header convention described for amtscript.js. The exact jshint/jslint directive flags used in amtscript.js were not visible to me, so the specific directive options may differ slightly from the sibling file's actual content.
Verify the change is correct and complete; do not refactor unrelated code.

fix confidence: 🟡 60 medium — react 👍/👎 to teach the reviewer