Repository navigation
Nuget: update how we handle the api key - #236
Merged
davidglassborow merged 6 commits intoSep 21, 2026
Merged
Conversation
florenzen
changed the title
davidglassborow
self-requested a review
September 21, 2026 06:29
davidglassborow
deleted the
229-nuget-update-how-we-handle-the-api-key
branch
September 21, 2026 06:30
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses #229.
I created a NuGet organization
flips.fslaborgand add you, @davidglassborow, as administrator. I had to record an e-mail address for the organisation. I used an alias in my personal e-mail account for this, but if you have an idea how we could use a shared, dedicated one here, I'd be happy to change that.I created a Trusted Publishing policy for the repository and published version 2.4.13-pre.1 as a test using the adapted pipeline.
@davidglassborow, would you review this change?