Skip to content

Takes meta-model 0.94.0 - #78

Merged
robertblust merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
takes-meta-model-0-94-0
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

robertblust merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
takes-meta-model-0-94-0

Conversation

@robertblust

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The upgrade moves the tooling and the instance check's workflow ref from 0.92.0 to 0.94.0 and the vendored core from 0.67.0 to 0.69.0. Core changes in one sentence of its conventions, R9, which now admits an enum type column for a ref → by row beside a string one. No page of this instance changes, and no schema it vendors does; the release ships the requirements pack, which this instance does not take. Upstream notes: https://github.com/companygraph/meta-model/releases/tag/v0.94.0.

Verified: the upgrade ran, a second run found nothing to do, and check passes; conventions-format, conventions-check and conventions-sync check pass.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The upgrade moves the tooling in .companygraph/manifest.json and the instance check's workflow ref from 0.92.0 to 0.94.0 and the vendored core from 0.67.0 to 0.69.0. Core changes in one sentence of its conventions: R9 admits an enum type column for a ref → by row beside a string one, so a schema that can list the types a row may name has R8 hold them. No page of this instance changes, and no schema it vendors does; the release ships the requirements pack, which this instance does not take. Upstream notes are at https://github.com/companygraph/meta-model/releases/tag/v0.94.0.

Verified: npx --yes 'github:companygraph/meta-model#v0.94.0' upgrade . ran, a second run found nothing to do, and check . passes; conventions-format, conventions-check and conventions-sync check pass. The agent pass over the writing rules was not run, since no page changed.

Process: Delivery
Phase: Implement
Track: Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@robertblust
robertblust merged commit 57707b0 into main Oct 12, 2026
2 checks passed
@robertblust
robertblust deleted the takes-meta-model-0-94-0 branch October 12, 2026 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant