Skip to content

Mention Image Volume Size Check in 1.9.x to 1.10.x upgrade - #1122

Merged
votdev merged 1 commit into
harvester:mainfrom
votdev:issue_10351_img_size_validator
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

votdev merged 1 commit into
harvester:mainfrom
votdev:issue_10351_img_size_validator

Conversation

@votdev

@votdev votdev commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The following changes are applied by the PR:

  • add information about the Image Volume Size Check that is performed during the upgrade from v1.9.x to v1.10.0.
  • Modify the sidebar_position in the front matter of all MD files below docs/upgrade.
  • The MD file for the upgrade v1.8.x to v1.9.0 is added as an empty template. Should be added to main branch soonish when v1.9.0 is released.

Related to: harvester/harvester#10351

Problem:

Solution:

Related Issue(s):

Test plan:

Additional documentation or context

@votdev votdev self-assigned this Sep 2, 2026
@votdev
votdev requested review from a team and jillian-maroket as code owners September 2, 2026 09:54
@votdev
votdev requested a review from w13915984028 September 2, 2026 09:54
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 629f6a5
😎 Deploy Preview https://6aad09aee99a5a86ebea9768--harvester-preview.netlify.app

Comment thread docs/upgrade/v1-9-x-to-v1-10-x.md Outdated

@WebberHuang1118 WebberHuang1118 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we provide a way to check the image volume size before starting the upgrade, similar to the pre-check script described here?

@votdev

votdev commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Should we provide a way to check the image volume size before starting the upgrade, similar to the pre-check script described here?

Yes, we came to the conclusion here to add a separate pre-flight check script.

@votdev
votdev force-pushed the issue_10351_img_size_validator branch 2 times, most recently from c7c52ea to af27cfc Compare September 4, 2026 13:09
@votdev
votdev force-pushed the issue_10351_img_size_validator branch 2 times, most recently from 53963e0 to 4ef6c05 Compare September 7, 2026 09:44
WebberHuang1118
WebberHuang1118 previously approved these changes Sep 7, 2026

@WebberHuang1118 WebberHuang1118 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks.

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

  • Queue this pull request

@jillian-maroket jillian-maroket left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review done

Comment thread docs/upgrade/v1-9-x-to-v1-10-x.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/upgrade/v1-9-x-to-v1-10-x.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/upgrade/v1-9-x-to-v1-10-x.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/upgrade/v1-9-x-to-v1-10-x.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/upgrade/v1-9-x-to-v1-10-x.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/vm/create-vm.md Outdated
Comment thread docs/volume/create-volume.md Outdated
Related to: harvester/harvester#10351
Related to: harvester/harvester#11315
Related to: harvester/upgrade-helpers#53

Co-authored-by: Jillian <jillian.maroket@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Volker Theile <vtheile@suse.com>
@votdev
votdev force-pushed the issue_10351_img_size_validator branch from d2b4b7c to 629f6a5 Compare September 18, 2026 09:45
@votdev
votdev merged commit 7d635a4 into harvester:main Sep 18, 2026
4 checks passed
@votdev
votdev deleted the issue_10351_img_size_validator branch September 18, 2026 09:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants