Skip to content

The note is not required now as the support for Harvester CSI driver RWX is present - #1138

Open
saurabhsadhalesuse wants to merge 6 commits into
harvester:mainfrom
saurabhsadhalesuse:main
Open

saurabhsadhalesuse wants to merge 6 commits into
harvester:mainfrom
saurabhsadhalesuse:main

Conversation

@saurabhsadhalesuse

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Problem:

The note present in the documentation causes confusion for RWX support for harvester-csi driver.

Solution:

This PR removes those notes about RWX support not present.

Related Issue(s):

Test plan:

Additional documentation or context

Removed note about single-node volume support and related issue.

Signed-off-by: saurabhsadhalesuse <saurabh.sadhale@suse.com>
Removed note about current limitations of Harvester CSI driver regarding multi-node volume support.

Signed-off-by: saurabhsadhalesuse <saurabh.sadhale@suse.com>
Removed note about current limitations of Harvester CSI driver regarding volume support.

Signed-off-by: saurabhsadhalesuse <saurabh.sadhale@suse.com>
Removed note about current limitations of Harvester CSI driver regarding volume support.

Signed-off-by: saurabhsadhalesuse <saurabh.sadhale@suse.com>
Removed note about Harvester CSI driver volume support limitations.

Signed-off-by: saurabhsadhalesuse <saurabh.sadhale@suse.com>
Removed note about Harvester CSI driver limitations on volume support.

Signed-off-by: saurabhsadhalesuse <saurabh.sadhale@suse.com>

:::note

Currently, the Harvester CSI driver only supports single-node read-write(RWO) volumes. Please follow the [issue #1992](https://github.com/harvester/harvester/issues/1992) for future multi-node `read-only`(ROX) and `read-write`(RWX) support.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of deleting the note entirely, we should update it to clarify the supported access modes.
Currently, the harvester csi driver only supports:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let me make the changes and submit again.

@votdev votdev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, however, i agree with #1138 (comment)

@mergify

mergify Bot commented Sep 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Tick the box to add this pull request to the merge queue (same as @mergifyio queue).

  • Queue this pull request

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants