feat: demo DFS for graph without explicit adjList structure - #805
Draft
Shreyas4991 wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
feat: demo DFS for graph without explicit adjList structure#805Shreyas4991 wants to merge 2 commits into
Shreyas4991 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is also a demo PR not intended to be merged.
It is a variant of #804 in which we completely remove the explicit adjacency list structure and generate it non computably at the top level DFS.run function. Same AI acknowledgement as in #804. One can still analyze the algorithm.
Collectively this PR and #804 show that we can entirely work with existing graph definitions in mathlib for verifying graph algorithms in the context of the discussion in #503