Skip to content

docs: link QuoteRequest fields to their RouteOptions docs - #586

Merged
chybisov merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/order-doc-comment
Sep 24, 2026
Merged

chybisov merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/order-doc-comment

Conversation

@chybisov

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Which Linear task is linked to this PR?

Part of EXBE-617

Why was it implemented this way?

QuoteRequest.order, slippage, fee, integrator and referrer had no doc comment, while the same fields on RouteOptions / RouteOptionsBase are documented (default order, slippage as a decimal proportion, fee meaning, …). This adds @see links, the pattern the neighbouring fields (refundAddress, disableFees, distributionFees) already use, so editor hovers on QuoteRequest show the real docs.

Only doc comments change: the emitted .js is identical and the .d.ts diff is five /** @see … */ lines.

It is also the first release through the new Changesets pipeline (#585): after merge, CI opens the chore: version packages PR (18.12.0 → 18.12.1), and merging that publishes 18.12.1 with a v18.12.1 tag and a GitHub Release.

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review and testing of my code.
  • This pull request is focused and addresses a single problem.
  • I added a changeset (pnpm changeset), or this PR does not change the published package.

@chybisov
chybisov requested a review from melianessa September 24, 2026 11:07
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: a1bae31

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@lifi/types Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@chybisov
chybisov merged commit 6f76911 into main Sep 24, 2026
3 checks passed
@chybisov
chybisov deleted the docs/order-doc-comment branch September 24, 2026 11:12
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant