Improve API consistency review workflow

[Quim Muntal (qmuntal)]

Summary

Improve the API consistency review workflow based on recent execution history. Six dispatched reviews completed their analysis but failed label publication with No issue/PR number available.

• Pass standard aw_context metadata from the fork dispatcher so safe-output handlers can resolve the PR without relying on model-supplied targets.
• Skip test-only and example-verifier-only changes in both triggers, and include the PR number in run titles.
• Add upstream locations for all eight providers and identify Microsoft.Extensions.AI as the primary .NET reference for the Go message model. Use complete repository URLs while retaining relative source paths.
• Add a Markdown summary template and centralize outcome/label handling, including stale-approval cleanup and compact out-of-scope summaries.
• Remove the obsolete CLI proxy workaround and use gh-aw's default MCP transport. Regenerate the workflow with gh-aw v0.88.7.

Validation

• Workflow compilation passed with no warnings.
• Offline regression checks passed for eight path-filter cases, the old missing-context reproduction, dispatched and native PR context, and run titles. Dispatch calls were mocked; context resolution used the pinned gh-aw helper.
• Fork dispatcher lint passed. Generated workflow lint passed with narrow exclusions for the existing copilot-requests and concurrency.queue syntax compatibility issues.
• git diff --check passed; editor diagnostics reported no errors.
• No live workflow run was dispatched. Go tests were not run because the changes only affect workflow configuration and prompts.

[Copilot]

Copilot review overview

🟡 Changes recommended

The otelprovider guidance includes an unrelated Python telemetry module that could misdirect parity reviews.

Get a fresh assessment by requesting another Copilot review.

Review effort: Balanced
Findings: 1

Open (1)

• Remove unrelated _telemetry.py path from otelprovider reviews · New

What changed in this PR

Improves API consistency reviews by making fork dispatches reliable and expanding upstream guidance.

Changes:

• Adds PR context, filtering, and descriptive run names.
• Centralizes review outcomes and label handling.
• Updates upstream references and regenerates the workflow.

File	Description
.github/​workflows/​go-api-consistency-review.md	Refines scope, references, and output policy.
.github/​workflows/​go-api-consistency-review.lock.yml	Regenerates the executable workflow.
.github/​workflows/​go-api-consistency-review-forks.yml	Passes PR context for fork dispatches.

---

💡 Add a code-review agent skill or configure MCP servers for context-aware, tailored reviews. Learn more in the docs.