Repository navigation
Python: Description not set in OrchestrationHandoffs when adding agent by name #13122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Audric Schiltknecht (audricschiltknecht)
wants to merge
2
commits into
microsoft:main
Choose a base branch
from
audricschiltknecht:fix/python-description-handoff-by-name
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ def test_orchestration_handoff_add(): | |
| agent_a = MockAgent() | ||
| agent_b = MockAgent() | ||
|
|
||
| agent_a.description = "Description Agent A" | ||
| agent_b.description = "Description Agent B" | ||
|
|
||
| orchestration_handoffs = OrchestrationHandoffs().add(agent_a, agent_b).add(agent_b, agent_a) | ||
|
|
||
| assert isinstance(orchestration_handoffs, OrchestrationHandoffs) | ||
|
|
@@ -272,10 +275,48 @@ def test_orchestration_handoff_add(): | |
| assert len(orchestration_handoffs[agent_b.name]) == 1 | ||
| for handoff_agent_name, handoff_description in orchestration_handoffs[agent_a.name].items(): | ||
| assert handoff_agent_name == agent_b.name | ||
| assert handoff_description == "" | ||
| assert handoff_description == "Description Agent B" | ||
| for handoff_agent_name, handoff_description in orchestration_handoffs[agent_b.name].items(): | ||
| assert handoff_agent_name == agent_a.name | ||
| assert handoff_description == "" | ||
| assert handoff_description == "Description Agent A" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_orchestration_handoff_add_with_description(): | ||
|
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is working correctly in main/released version |
||
| """Test the add method of the OrchestrationHandoffs.""" | ||
| agent_a = MockAgent() | ||
| agent_b = MockAgent() | ||
|
|
||
| orchestration_handoffs = ( | ||
| OrchestrationHandoffs() | ||
| .add(agent_a, agent_b, "Description from Agent A to Agent B") | ||
| .add(agent_b, agent_a, "Description from Agent B to Agent A") | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| for handoff_agent_name, handoff_description in orchestration_handoffs[agent_a.name].items(): | ||
| assert handoff_agent_name == agent_b.name | ||
| assert handoff_description == "Description from Agent A to Agent B" | ||
| for handoff_agent_name, handoff_description in orchestration_handoffs[agent_b.name].items(): | ||
| assert handoff_agent_name == agent_a.name | ||
| assert handoff_description == "Description from Agent B to Agent A" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_orchestration_handoff_add_by_name_with_description(): | ||
|
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. In main/released version, |
||
| """Test the add method of the OrchestrationHandoffs.""" | ||
| agent_a = MockAgent() | ||
| agent_b = MockAgent() | ||
|
|
||
| orchestration_handoffs = ( | ||
| OrchestrationHandoffs() | ||
| .add(agent_a.name, agent_b.name, "Description from Agent A to Agent B") | ||
| .add(agent_b.name, agent_a.name, "Description from Agent B to Agent A") | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| for handoff_agent_name, handoff_description in orchestration_handoffs[agent_a.name].items(): | ||
| assert handoff_agent_name == agent_b.name | ||
| assert handoff_description == "Description from Agent A to Agent B" | ||
| for handoff_agent_name, handoff_description in orchestration_handoffs[agent_b.name].items(): | ||
| assert handoff_agent_name == agent_a.name | ||
| assert handoff_description == "Description from Agent B to Agent A" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_orchestration_handoff_add_many(): | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, thank you for your contributions! But this change doesn't alter the logic. The result would stay the same.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what I thought too! But from testing, it seems the
elsepart of the statement has priority from the left part of theorexpression (which I honestly don't understand why)