docs: add OmniRoute admission lanes finding - #135
Open
branben wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Per-session virtual admission lanes as runtime-layer complement to WG Topic modelcontextprotocol#5 (tool dependencies). Evidence from production 50k+ star repo with 109 tests passing. References: - WG Issue modelcontextprotocol#126 (Tool dependencies) - OmniRoute PR #9654
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds an experimental finding documenting OmniRoute's per-session virtual admission lanes as a production implementation of the runtime-layer complement to WG Topic #5 (tool dependencies).
What this demonstrates
Relevant WG work
Security insight
PR #10110 (pre-auth resource exhaustion) reveals that fake credentials could shard admission lanes before auth. The WG should consider whether malicious declarations in frontmatter could exploit the same pattern.
Verification
Scope
Tests the dispatch layer, not the manifest layer. Does NOT implement the WG's proposed frontmatter field — implements the runtime gate that makes skill declarations safe under multi-user load.