[calixteman]

Bound 32-bit reads to the source view to avoid RangeError and reading unrelated bytes. The scalar loops treat missing RGB bytes as zeros.

[github-actions]

Viewer preview

🗑️ Viewer previews removed.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.58%. Comparing base (aa89148) to head (7924e33).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #22402      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.58%   90.58%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         278      278              
  Lines       68568    68568              
==========================================
- Hits        62115    62112       -3     
- Misses       6453     6456       +3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
browsertest	66.29% <100.00%> (ø)
fonttest	8.99% <0.00%> (ø)
integrationtest	69.54% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittest	61.26% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittestcli	59.02% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 1 benchmark

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 86 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 174 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	PredictorStream: PNG xref streams (issue20513.pdf)	400.9 µs	449 µs	-10.71%
⚡	PartialEvaluator.buildPath: lines (bug1743245.pdf)	19.2 ms	17 ms	+13.21%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing calixteman:truncated-rgb-image-data (7924e33) with master (22f5df1)²}

Footnotes

1. 174 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

2. No successful run was found on master (aa89148) during the generation of this report, so 22f5df1 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Reference tests

Results for 7924e33 (run, references from mozilla/pdf.js.refs@c5cf6c9ab0).

Platform	Status	Tests	Total runtime	Errors	Different	FBF	No reference	Report
	✅	1413	12m 42s	0	0	0	0
	⚠️	1413	14m 28s	0	1	0	0	view differences

The report is kept for 30 days and replaced by the next run.

[timvandermeij]

r=me, with passing browser tests. Thanks!